08.11.2014 Views

Modern Polymer Spect..

Modern Polymer Spect..

Modern Polymer Spect..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

218 5 Vibratioid <strong>Spect</strong>roscopy oj Pollyeprides<br />

In addition to frequencies, dichroic properties can be altered by small structural<br />

changes. Since the peptide group in the uII-helix is more inclined to the helix axis<br />

than it is in the a,-helix, the DRs of amide modes are expected to differ significantly<br />

between the two structures. To calculate the DR of, for example, ainide I of an<br />

a-helix we need to know (?g/dQ~),, and (l@/?Q,),, which involves knowing the L,,<br />

and dc/dS, (see Eq. (5-5)). Since the L,r are known from the normal mode calculation<br />

and the d$/ciSl have been obtained from ab azirio calculations [63], it becomes<br />

possible to synthesize a band intensity profile for a given (even finite) ol-helix structure.<br />

Such a calculation has been done for the oll-helix and the a11-helix for amide I<br />

and aniide I1 by computing the IR intensity profiles for the two polarization components<br />

of these two bands [141]. The results show that the DRs are significantly<br />

different enough to pennit identification of these structures from this property.<br />

The ability to predict a band intensity profile opens up an important additional<br />

dimension in vibrational analysis. It means that we will be able to relate subtle<br />

spectral differences to small structural changes with a greater degree of confidence.<br />

Thus, it has been possible to confirm that an observed three-component contour of<br />

the amide I band of tropomyosin is indeed expected for a coiled-coil a-helix [142].<br />

Extensions to understanding the normal modes of proteins become possible [ 1431.<br />

The systematic incorporation in an SDFF of dipoles and dipole fluxes to calculate<br />

IR intensities [ 1441 will finally bring to the vibrational analysis of polymeric niolecules<br />

the completeness and flexibility needed to make it a much more powerful<br />

structural tool.<br />

5.4.2.3 3lo-Helix<br />

The 3lo-helix represents a different topology than the a-helix, being 4 - I rather<br />

than 5 - 1, and is therefore of importance in studying the vibrational dynamics<br />

of polypeptide helices. At present, its only clear identification has been in PAIB, so<br />

its characterization from this polypeptide may lack soine generality. On the other<br />

hand, the excellence of the experimental data [I 101 makes its vibrational analysis<br />

secure.<br />

Since the structure of PAIB has not been determined in detail by diffraction<br />

methods, the normal-mode studies [110] were based on a 310 structure obtained<br />

from conforniational analysis [l 1 11 (Figure 5-7). The vibrational studies compared<br />

experimental data with predictions for two helices, and the results clearly favored<br />

the 310- over the a-helix. The threefold screw symmetry of this structure results in<br />

El and E2 species modes reducing to doubly degenerate E species modes. The main<br />

chain force field was the same as that for oll-PLA, with additional force constants<br />

refined for the (CH3)2 group. Some inodes from the full analysis [110] are compared<br />

with those of q-PLA in Table 5-1 1.<br />

The observed amide I frequencies are slightly lower for the 3lo-helix than for<br />

the cq-helix because of the slightly stronger hydrogen bond (N...O = 2.83 A versus<br />

2.86 A, respectively). The increased splitting is undoubtedly due to the different<br />

TDC interactions as a function of conformation. This probably also accounts for<br />

the large change in the A-E splitting of the aniide 11 modes. The nominal aniide 111<br />

modes (they contain no CN s and NH ib dominates only in the 1312 cn-' mode!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!