2,46 Mb - GuÃaSalud
2,46 Mb - GuÃaSalud
2,46 Mb - GuÃaSalud
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 2. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation according to OXFORD<br />
Levels<br />
of evidence<br />
Ia<br />
Ib<br />
II<br />
III<br />
IV<br />
Level 1 studies<br />
Level 2 studies<br />
Level 3 studies<br />
Type of evidence<br />
Systematic review with homogeneity of level 1 studies<br />
Level 1 studies<br />
Level 2 studies<br />
Systematic review of level 2 studies<br />
Level 3 studies<br />
Systematic review of level 3 studies<br />
Consensus, expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal<br />
Follow:<br />
• Blinded comparison to a valid reference test ()<br />
• Appropriate spectrum of patients<br />
• Present only one of these biases:<br />
• Non-representative population (the sample does not refl ect the population group<br />
where the test will be implemented)<br />
• Comparison with an inappropriate reference standard («gold standard») (the<br />
test to be assessed is part of the gold standard or the outcome of the test to be<br />
assessed poses an infl uence on the carrying out of the gold standard<br />
• Non-blinded comparison<br />
• Case control studies<br />
Present two or more criteria in level 2 studies<br />
Recommendation<br />
A<br />
B<br />
C<br />
D<br />
Evidence<br />
Ia or Ib<br />
II<br />
III<br />
IV<br />
124 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN THE NHS