08.11.2014 Views

2,46 Mb - GuíaSalud

2,46 Mb - GuíaSalud

2,46 Mb - GuíaSalud

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation according to OXFORD<br />

Levels<br />

of evidence<br />

Ia<br />

Ib<br />

II<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

Level 1 studies<br />

Level 2 studies<br />

Level 3 studies<br />

Type of evidence<br />

Systematic review with homogeneity of level 1 studies<br />

Level 1 studies<br />

Level 2 studies<br />

Systematic review of level 2 studies<br />

Level 3 studies<br />

Systematic review of level 3 studies<br />

Consensus, expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal<br />

Follow:<br />

• Blinded comparison to a valid reference test ()<br />

• Appropriate spectrum of patients<br />

• Present only one of these biases:<br />

• Non-representative population (the sample does not refl ect the population group<br />

where the test will be implemented)<br />

• Comparison with an inappropriate reference standard («gold standard») (the<br />

test to be assessed is part of the gold standard or the outcome of the test to be<br />

assessed poses an infl uence on the carrying out of the gold standard<br />

• Non-blinded comparison<br />

• Case control studies<br />

Present two or more criteria in level 2 studies<br />

Recommendation<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Evidence<br />

Ia or Ib<br />

II<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

124 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN THE NHS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!