08.11.2014 Views

2,46 Mb - GuíaSalud

2,46 Mb - GuíaSalud

2,46 Mb - GuíaSalud

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.1. Impaired Fating Glucoseucose (IFG)<br />

Impaired fasting glucose is the stage used to define fasting plasma glucose between<br />

normal glycaemia and diabetes. It is defined between the 110-125 mg/dl<br />

margins, according to WHO and IDF.<br />

According to the WHO and IDF criteria, a 5% or higher prevalence is stated,<br />

which increases with age; according to the ADA criteria, its prevalence triples or<br />

quadruples (71).<br />

The classification as impaired fasting glucose can be hardly reproducible. If<br />

glycaemia repeats after six weeks, impaired fasting glucoseis confirmed in 51% to<br />

64% of the cases; 10% of the cases are classified as diabetic and the rest as normal<br />

(70).<br />

These patients have a five-fold risk to develop diabetes (70). Their cardiovascular<br />

risk (AMI, stroke, non-fatal strode) is higher (RR 1.19), and likewise is<br />

mortality higher (RR 1.28) (70).<br />

SR of cohort<br />

studies<br />

2+<br />

6.2. Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)<br />

IGT is the stage defined by a plasma glycaemia in venous blood between 140 mg/<br />

dl and 200 mg/dl two hours after the 75g glucose tolerance test.<br />

It is more frequent in women. Its prevalence is around 10%; it increases with<br />

age and varies depending on race.<br />

IGT reproducibility after six weeks is low. It is confirmed in 33% to 48% of<br />

the cases; 36% to 48% are reclassified as normal and 6% to 13% as diabetic (2; 70).<br />

IGT is associated with a higher risk than altered basal glycaemia to develop<br />

diabetes. This risk is 6 times higher than in normoglycaemic patients [RR 6.02 (CI<br />

95%: 4.66 a 7.38)], and up to 12 times more if both are associated [RR 12.21 (CI<br />

95%: 4.32 a 20.10)] (70).<br />

IGT also implies a higher cardiovascular mortality risk (RR 1.48) and overall<br />

mortality risk (RR 1.66) (70).<br />

SR of cohort<br />

studies<br />

2+<br />

6.3. Preventive interventions in patients with intermediate<br />

hyperglycaemia<br />

There are several SRs (72-74), evidence summaries (70) and a recent RCT (75)<br />

not included in the SR, which analyse the pharmacological and non-pharmacological<br />

intervention effectiveness in the prevention of diabetes and cardiovascular<br />

morbimortality in diabetic stages. There is no uniformity in the inclusion criteria<br />

of patients in the studies.<br />

SR of RCT<br />

1+<br />

48 CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN THE NHS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!