11.11.2014 Views

Annual Report 2008 - Central Queensland University

Annual Report 2008 - Central Queensland University

Annual Report 2008 - Central Queensland University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Strategic<br />

Focus<br />

operational plans will contribute to the <strong>University</strong>’s strategic direction, forming the<br />

foundation for budget formulation, the expression in monetary terms of the ways<br />

and means of implementing the <strong>University</strong>’s Plan.<br />

Governance<br />

In <strong>2008</strong>, as part of the <strong>University</strong>’s Organisational Review, the <strong>University</strong><br />

commissioned a review of its governance functions, which was undertaken by an<br />

external consultant. One of the recommendations of that review was to strengthen<br />

the operation and support for the governance functions of the <strong>University</strong> and in<br />

particular Council, Academic Board and associated committees. The Review also<br />

identified, amongst other issues, the need for an assessment of <strong>University</strong> policy<br />

development and management systems.<br />

In response, a new Governance Division was created in <strong>2008</strong>, reporting to the<br />

Executive Director (Corporate Services). The Division enables good governance,<br />

supporting the <strong>University</strong>’s formal governance structure of Council and Academic<br />

Board and associated corporate responsibilities. This a) ensures sound <strong>University</strong><br />

wide policies and processes exist; b) protects the university from legal risk; and c)<br />

maintains the corporate and professional reputation of the <strong>University</strong>. The Division<br />

is also responsible for the provision of administrative support to Chancellery<br />

Executives, the Records Management Office; and the Graduation and Ceremony<br />

Management Office.<br />

RIO TINTO PARTNERSHIP<br />

Rio Tinto Coal Australia’s<br />

Hail Creek Mine has signed a<br />

Memorandum of Understanding<br />

(MOU) with CQ<strong>University</strong>,<br />

designed to help shake the<br />

skills shortage across multiple<br />

disciplines in the Mackay region.<br />

Areas including health and safety,<br />

environmental science, business<br />

and communications, human<br />

resources, engineering, surveying<br />

and geology are all designed<br />

to benefit from the three year<br />

partnership program.<br />

The Organisational Review also recommended a structure that would support<br />

integration of strategic planning and budgetary modeling. The Division of Strategy,<br />

Quality and Review was therefore established, reporting to the Executive Director<br />

(Corporate Services) to provide analysis of the <strong>University</strong>’s operations, systems,<br />

business processes and performance against selected criteria. In doing so the<br />

Division promotes efficiency, economy and effectiveness of management processes<br />

as well as the reliability and accuracy of <strong>University</strong> operations.<br />

Review of Academic Governance<br />

Background<br />

The <strong>University</strong> Council commissioned a Review of Academic Governance at<br />

its meeting in July 2007 in response to Recommendation 2 of the <strong>Report</strong> of an<br />

Audit of <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Queensland</strong> <strong>University</strong> by the Australian Universities Quality<br />

Agency (AUQA) of 2006. Section 2.2 of the AUQA Audit <strong>Report</strong> addressed<br />

concerns that “The Academic Board has not provided strong leadership to the<br />

<strong>University</strong>’s academic community, and has sometimes failed to meet its quorum”.<br />

Recommendation 2 states “AUQA recommends that <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Queensland</strong> <strong>University</strong><br />

Council develop strategies to ensure it is able to inform and balance its fiduciary<br />

governance responsibilities with its academic governance responsibilities.”<br />

Two external consultants with lengthy experience in academic governance were<br />

invited to undertake the review. At the outset, the consultants sought information on<br />

progress against the recommendations made in a report submitted to the <strong>University</strong><br />

in July 2007 (Quality Project <strong>Report</strong>) in response to the AUQA Audit <strong>Report</strong> 2006.<br />

One of the terms of reference of the review was to propose “directions to CQU to<br />

provide the Quality Management System” and “address implications for the next<br />

AUQA audit”.<br />

The current review involved interviews with around 100 individuals comprising<br />

Council members, staff and students and confirmed that many of the matters<br />

addressed in the July 2007 Quality Project <strong>Report</strong> are still of relevance.<br />

38<br />

<strong>Report</strong><br />

The Review of Academic Governance report made 16 recommendations. All actions<br />

addressing the 16 recommendations were approved by Academic Board or Council<br />

as appropriate.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!