Annual Report 2008 - Central Queensland University
Annual Report 2008 - Central Queensland University
Annual Report 2008 - Central Queensland University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Strategic<br />
Focus<br />
operational plans will contribute to the <strong>University</strong>’s strategic direction, forming the<br />
foundation for budget formulation, the expression in monetary terms of the ways<br />
and means of implementing the <strong>University</strong>’s Plan.<br />
Governance<br />
In <strong>2008</strong>, as part of the <strong>University</strong>’s Organisational Review, the <strong>University</strong><br />
commissioned a review of its governance functions, which was undertaken by an<br />
external consultant. One of the recommendations of that review was to strengthen<br />
the operation and support for the governance functions of the <strong>University</strong> and in<br />
particular Council, Academic Board and associated committees. The Review also<br />
identified, amongst other issues, the need for an assessment of <strong>University</strong> policy<br />
development and management systems.<br />
In response, a new Governance Division was created in <strong>2008</strong>, reporting to the<br />
Executive Director (Corporate Services). The Division enables good governance,<br />
supporting the <strong>University</strong>’s formal governance structure of Council and Academic<br />
Board and associated corporate responsibilities. This a) ensures sound <strong>University</strong><br />
wide policies and processes exist; b) protects the university from legal risk; and c)<br />
maintains the corporate and professional reputation of the <strong>University</strong>. The Division<br />
is also responsible for the provision of administrative support to Chancellery<br />
Executives, the Records Management Office; and the Graduation and Ceremony<br />
Management Office.<br />
RIO TINTO PARTNERSHIP<br />
Rio Tinto Coal Australia’s<br />
Hail Creek Mine has signed a<br />
Memorandum of Understanding<br />
(MOU) with CQ<strong>University</strong>,<br />
designed to help shake the<br />
skills shortage across multiple<br />
disciplines in the Mackay region.<br />
Areas including health and safety,<br />
environmental science, business<br />
and communications, human<br />
resources, engineering, surveying<br />
and geology are all designed<br />
to benefit from the three year<br />
partnership program.<br />
The Organisational Review also recommended a structure that would support<br />
integration of strategic planning and budgetary modeling. The Division of Strategy,<br />
Quality and Review was therefore established, reporting to the Executive Director<br />
(Corporate Services) to provide analysis of the <strong>University</strong>’s operations, systems,<br />
business processes and performance against selected criteria. In doing so the<br />
Division promotes efficiency, economy and effectiveness of management processes<br />
as well as the reliability and accuracy of <strong>University</strong> operations.<br />
Review of Academic Governance<br />
Background<br />
The <strong>University</strong> Council commissioned a Review of Academic Governance at<br />
its meeting in July 2007 in response to Recommendation 2 of the <strong>Report</strong> of an<br />
Audit of <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Queensland</strong> <strong>University</strong> by the Australian Universities Quality<br />
Agency (AUQA) of 2006. Section 2.2 of the AUQA Audit <strong>Report</strong> addressed<br />
concerns that “The Academic Board has not provided strong leadership to the<br />
<strong>University</strong>’s academic community, and has sometimes failed to meet its quorum”.<br />
Recommendation 2 states “AUQA recommends that <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Queensland</strong> <strong>University</strong><br />
Council develop strategies to ensure it is able to inform and balance its fiduciary<br />
governance responsibilities with its academic governance responsibilities.”<br />
Two external consultants with lengthy experience in academic governance were<br />
invited to undertake the review. At the outset, the consultants sought information on<br />
progress against the recommendations made in a report submitted to the <strong>University</strong><br />
in July 2007 (Quality Project <strong>Report</strong>) in response to the AUQA Audit <strong>Report</strong> 2006.<br />
One of the terms of reference of the review was to propose “directions to CQU to<br />
provide the Quality Management System” and “address implications for the next<br />
AUQA audit”.<br />
The current review involved interviews with around 100 individuals comprising<br />
Council members, staff and students and confirmed that many of the matters<br />
addressed in the July 2007 Quality Project <strong>Report</strong> are still of relevance.<br />
38<br />
<strong>Report</strong><br />
The Review of Academic Governance report made 16 recommendations. All actions<br />
addressing the 16 recommendations were approved by Academic Board or Council<br />
as appropriate.