15.11.2014 Views

2004 - 2007 - Cicely Saunders Institute - King's College London

2004 - 2007 - Cicely Saunders Institute - King's College London

2004 - 2007 - Cicely Saunders Institute - King's College London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.1.1 Improving Care and Services for People<br />

Affected by Cancer<br />

Gysels and Higginson conducted, for the National<br />

<strong>Institute</strong> of Clinical Excellence (NICE), the first comprehensive<br />

robust appraisal of research evidence in<br />

Supportive and Palliative Care in Cancer. Published in<br />

<strong>2004</strong>, this was the culmination of three years research,<br />

building on earlier systematic reviews within the<br />

department. It combined and appraised findings from<br />

339 studies from across the globe. It showed for the first<br />

time evidence for the effectiveness of some components<br />

of supportive and palliative care, especially for multiprofessional<br />

specialist palliative care teams, information<br />

provision and communication skills training 68 .<br />

Communication, co-ordination and patient<br />

education<br />

In an analysis of effectiveness, 12 studies (15 papers)<br />

showed communication skills training improved the<br />

communication of doctors and nurses, as assessed by<br />

self-report and patients, with effect sizes ranging from<br />

0.15 (modest) to 2 (high) 9 . One further study showed<br />

deterioration in outcomes. In depth analysis found that<br />

to be most effective at changing practice (and not just<br />

skills in artificial situations) training programmes need to<br />

take into account and address attitudes and beliefs 9 .<br />

These findings led the Department of Health in the UK<br />

to support a national roll out of communication skills<br />

training, to commit funding to specialist palliative care<br />

services and provided for the first time a research basis<br />

for supportive and palliative care elements of National<br />

Standards in Cancer Care, which now form part of the<br />

National Health Service Peer Review for cancer.<br />

However, there is also the problem of communicating<br />

between services. Farquhar, Barclay and colleagues<br />

studied in depth the concerns of GPs - of most concern<br />

was tardiness (with delays of up to eight days) especially<br />

at three stages in the patient journeys: (1) in the prediagnostic<br />

and diagnostic stage; (2) in the active<br />

treatment phase; and (3) when oncology withdrew and<br />

the focus of care switched back to the community for<br />

the terminal phase 142 , leading to suggestions in the NICE<br />

guidance about the prompt timing of information and the<br />

use of standardised formats.<br />

Interactive technologies and videotapes appear to be a<br />

promising method for patient education in cancer care.<br />

In an analysis of 1,678 patients, educational technologies<br />

showed improved patient knowledge but no change<br />

in patient satisfaction 320 although the analysis identified<br />

problems of heterogeneity (see figure 2.3).<br />

Figure 2.2 The NICE Research evidence produced by the<br />

team at King’s in <strong>2004</strong>, which is now improving how cancer<br />

care and support is provided<br />

Figure 2.3. Meta-analysis showing that video technologies in patient education improve knowledge but not satisfaction<br />

Source: Gysels and Higginson, Supportive Care in Cancer, <strong>2007</strong>;15:7-20<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!