Download - Friends International

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7.5 percent, Kampong Cham 4.4 percent and Neak Loeung 3.8 percent. The distribution of questionnaires thus follows similar trends as the snapshot survey, with the majority of forms completed in Phnom Penh. General Findings of the Questionnaire Survey 2009 This section, presenting the general findings of the questionnaire survey 2009, aims at analysing the results that are directly comparable to those of the snapshot survey and the questionnaire survey of the CSCN profile 2008. The analysis of the general findings will thus focus on the 3-fold categorisation of street children/youth, male to female ratio and gender distribution. Methodologically, this serves to cross check the accuracy of the data of the 2009 survey and observe annual changes. Total by Category 7% 12% 50% SLC SWC SLF Of the total 1,549 questionnaires completed, 50 percent (774) of the street children/youth felt into the category SWC; 31 percent (472) SLC; and 12 percent (187) SLF. 7 percent did not provide any information or were categorised as young migrants 31% or referral NGO. The detailed questionnaire survey thus points to a similar distribution of categories as in the questionnaire survey of the CSCN profile 2008 (51 percent SWC; 32 percent SLC; 17 percent SLF). However, there is a much higher No Info prevalence of SLC than identified in the snapshot survey (12.2 percent). One explanation for this outcome is the rela-tively higher number of questionnaires filled out in Phnom Penh (67.5 percent), where the SLC phenomenon is most prevalent, compared to the children/youth counted in the snapshot survey. Of the SLF there is statistical consent, meaning that the group of SWC of the questionnaire survey has decreased in proportion with the growth of the SLC group. Regarding the gender distribution of the street children/youth population addressed in the questionnaire survey, 70.8 percent (1096) were male, 29.1 percent (451) female and only 0.1 percent (1) transsexual. Distributed on each category the male to female CSCN 30 CSCN Street Children Profile 2009
atio for SLC are 84.5 percent (399) male and 15.5 percent (73) female – indicating similar trends as observed in the snapshot survey. For the SWC, 66.1 percent (511) are male and 33.9 percent (262) female, showing an increase of the male ratio. And finally for the SLF category, there is 66.3 percent (124) male and 33.7 percent (63) female, indicating a slightly increase of the male prevalence. The age distribution of the street children/youth participating in the CSCN questionnaire survey 2009 has been divided into five groups. In the category between 0 to 5 years of age a total of 3 percent (41) were identified; 17 percent (269) were between 6 and 9; 33 percent (514) between 10 and 14; 22 percent (336) between 15 and 18; and 23 percent (359) above the age of 18. 29 children/youth were not able to inform the CSCN social workers about their age, which Total Age Distribution 2% 3% 17% 23% 22% 33% 0-5 6-9 10-14 15-18 18+ No Info often occurs in the street population (cases where the birth of a child has not been registered or the personal documents have been lost / taken away). According to these figures, the majority of street children/youth are thus between the age of 10 to 14, closely followed by the 15-18 and 18+ category. The average age of the children/youth who responded to the question (1,520) was 14.3 years. The mode age, referring to the highest fre-quency, is 10 years, and the median age 14 years. To sum up, the CSCN questionnaire survey 2009 reveals that the major trend of the street chil-dren/youth participating are male, working on the streets and are in their midteenage years. What follows is a more in-depth presentation of the findings of the location specific question-naire survey. The data analysis is conducted by comparing this year’s result with the ones from last year, both the 2008 snapshot - and questionnaire survey. Moreover, the location specific results are compared to the 2009 average and draws on the information derived in the secon-dary data review of Frame I. Finally, each section is launched with an introduction to the specific location emphasising characteristics relevant to understand the analytical outcome. CSCN CSCN Street Children Profile 2009 31
Page 2 and 3: ABBREVIATIONS ADB ATS CCASVA CRC CS
Page 4 and 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....
Page 6 and 7: INTRODUCTION Since 1991, when more
Page 8 and 9: ii. To conduct collective research
Page 10 and 11: Cambodian children working and/or l
Page 12 and 13: presentation will be conducted in t
Page 14 and 15: • Short interviews; • Do not fo
Page 16 and 17: youth, as opposed to open-ended one
Page 18 and 19: to survive on less than 1 dollar a
Page 20 and 21: challenge for Cambodia is to expand
Page 22 and 23: the largest section of migrants at
Page 24 and 25: in detention centers to provide sup
Page 26 and 27: Total Number of Street Children/You
Page 28 and 29: eflecting the vulnerability of both
Page 32 and 33: PHNOM PENH Questionnaire Survey 200
Page 34 and 35: This graph illustrates the number o
Page 36 and 37: Origin of Families - Phnom Penh 200
Page 38 and 39: Level of Education upon Arrival at
Page 40 and 41: People the Child/Youth Lived With -
Page 42 and 43: Services Accessed by the Children/Y
Page 44 and 45: Work Undertaken The most common wor
Page 46 and 47: Children/Youth Registered by NGO -
Page 48 and 49: The Siem Reap data analysis, based
Page 50 and 51: Reasons for Living and/or Working o
Page 52 and 53: Time Spent on the Streets before Re
Page 54 and 55: Work Undertaken by the Children/You
Page 56 and 57: Services Accessed by the Children/Y
Page 58 and 59: Work Undertaken The most common wor
Page 60 and 61: Gender/Age Distribution of Children
Page 62 and 63: Origin of Families - Neak Loeung 20
Page 64 and 65: Level of Education upon Arrival at
Page 66 and 67: People the Child/Youth Lived With -
Page 68 and 69: Main Problems Faced on the Streets
Page 70 and 71: Summary: Main Findings of the NEAK
Page 72 and 73: SIHANOUKVILLE Questionnaire Survey
Page 74 and 75: Breakdown of Street Children/Youth
Page 76 and 77: Reasons for Living and/or Working o
Page 78 and 79: Time Spent on the Streets before Re
Page 80 and 81:
Work Undertaken by the Children/You
Page 82 and 83:
Services Accessed by the Children/Y
Page 84 and 85:
Main Problems Most problems faced b
Page 86 and 87:
Gender/Age Distribution of Children
Page 88 and 89:
Origin of Families - Kampong Cham 2
Page 90 and 91:
Level of Education upon Arrival at
Page 92 and 93:
People the Child/Youth Lived With -
Page 94 and 95:
Main Problems Faced on the Streets
Page 96 and 97:
Summary: Main Findings of the KAMPO
Page 98 and 99:
POIPET Questionnaire Survey 2009 Th
Page 100 and 101:
Breakdown of Street Children/Youth
Page 102 and 103:
Reasons for Living and/or Working o
Page 104 and 105:
Time Spent on the Streets before Re
Page 106 and 107:
Work Undertaken by the Children/You
Page 108 and 109:
Services Accessed by the Children/Y
Page 110 and 111:
Work Undertaken The most common wor
Page 112 and 113:
migration source and destination as
Page 114 and 115:
From the CSCN survey results it app
Page 116 and 117:
ate experienced is 16.4 percent, wi
Page 118 and 119:
years. Despite multiple factors lea
Page 120 and 121:
DAMNOK TOEK (GOUTTE d’EAU) Questi
Page 122 and 123:
KALIYAN MITH Questionnaire Location
Page 124 and 125:
MITH SAMLANH Questionnaire Location
Page 126 and 127:
KROUSAR THMEY Questionnaire Locatio
Page 128 and 129:
M’LOP TAPANG Questionnaire Locati
Page 130 and 131:
WORLD VISION CAMBODIA Questionnaire
Page 132 and 133:
CCASVA - Cambodian Children Against
Page 134 and 135:
Friends-International Questionnaire
Page 136 and 137:
LIST OF REFERENCES 1 Asian Developm
Page 138 and 139:
20 Ibid 21 Ibid 22 DCCAM From 1996
Page 140 and 141:
effect the drug has on their abilit
show all

Download - Friends International

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?