17.11.2014 Views

teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association

teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association

teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 26 ● Number 3, 2001<br />

See Figures 1 and 2 which provide the spatial context<br />

for the decision-making exercise.<br />

The following Activities 1 - 6 are intended to show the<br />

students that some of these sites are unsuitable for<br />

locating a nuclear waste facility. As they proceed<br />

through the pack, it is envisaged that they will progressively<br />

eliminate some of the sites. Eventually they will<br />

be left with a few possibilities from which they must<br />

choose, justifying their proposals.<br />

Activity 1 - Background<br />

The first activity asks students to think about the social,<br />

economic and geological factors associated with siting<br />

the facility - this is merely “setting the scene”. Hopefully<br />

the students will be able to assess the impact of the<br />

waste facility on island life.<br />

Activity 2 - The geology of the island<br />

In this exercise, the students are provided with a set of<br />

five specimens to describe and identify. These specimens<br />

correspond to the five potential sites. Fossils are<br />

included among the specimens and the pupils should<br />

compare them with the stratigraphic column in the<br />

pack. The fossils can be used to determine the relative<br />

ages of the sedimentary rocks. Dip arrows shown on the<br />

outline map can be used by the pupils to draw a simple<br />

cross-section (see Fig 2).<br />

Activity 3 - Plate tectonic setting<br />

This section covers the hazards associated with living in<br />

a tectonically active region. <strong>Earth</strong>quakes generated in<br />

the nearby collision zone may affect the island and the<br />

students are asked to plot the epicentre of earthquakes<br />

using seismograms. Volcanic monitoring data from the<br />

island is given and the students should try to interpret<br />

the significance of the measurements.<br />

Activity 4<br />

One of the proposed sites is located near the coast (see<br />

Fig 2). This activity examines the hazards posed by<br />

coastal processes; using historical coastline positions<br />

students can calculate the mean rate of erosion. If a<br />

sample of volcanic sand is available, the process of longshore<br />

drift can also be discussed.<br />

Activity 5<br />

Students can use the specimens to investigate permeability.<br />

This is an important factor in the choice of location<br />

since it is important to eliminate the chance<br />

radioactive material being transported by percolating<br />

groundwater. There are also several surface watercourses<br />

on the island, many near population centres.<br />

Activity 6<br />

Site investigation techniques are used prior to any<br />

major civil engineering project. Two examples of site<br />

investigation data are given and the students use these<br />

to locate subsurface problems in the region of one proposed<br />

site.<br />

Finally, the students are expected to fill in a short<br />

report, identifying the most appropriate choice and justifying<br />

their selection.<br />

Using the pack<br />

Geraint Price and his colleagues at the Museum have<br />

worked towards publishing this resource pack on the<br />

Internet, financially supported by the Curry Fund. It is<br />

intended that readers will be able to download the pack,<br />

(including a teachers’ guide with suggested answers)<br />

directly from the Museum’s website.<br />

Feedback<br />

The pack was presented to delegates at the ESTA 2001<br />

Annual Conference at Kingston University and we<br />

were delighted with the positive feedback on the activities.<br />

In addition, some suggestions were made for<br />

improving and developing the pack further and I am<br />

very grateful to everyone who contributed. If any readers<br />

use the pack in their <strong>teaching</strong>, feedback would be<br />

greatly appreciated.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

I would like to thank everyone who contributed to the<br />

development of the pack, in particular Geraint Price<br />

and his colleagues, the participants on the study day<br />

Dr Carolyn Heeps, Prof. Mike Bassett, Dr Charles<br />

Harris, Dr Pete Brabham, Dr Bob Owens and Sarah<br />

Chambers. A number of other people also contributed<br />

ideas and suggestions Dr Barbara Knowles (NERC),<br />

Dr Andrew Butcher, Dr David Bailey, Dr Glen Ford,<br />

Dr Jill Norton (all from the BGS), Dr Lesley Cherns,<br />

Dr Rod Gayer, Mr Pete Loader, Ms Jo Conway and Dr<br />

Liz Richards. I would also like to express my gratitude<br />

to the students from the two schools and to the Geologists’<br />

<strong>Association</strong> for support from the Curry Fund.<br />

Owain Thomas<br />

Teacher i/c Geology<br />

Amman Valley School,<br />

Margaret Street,<br />

Ammanford,<br />

Carmarthenshire.<br />

SA18 2NW<br />

Tel. (01269) 592441<br />

97 www.esta-uk.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!