17.11.2014 Views

teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association

teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association

teaching - Earth Science Teachers' Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TEACHING EARTH SCIENCES ● Volume 31 ● Number 4, 2006<br />

The <strong>Science</strong> of Global Warming<br />

PROFESSOR COLIN PRENTICE<br />

Peter Kennett’s notes on the lecture at Bristol<br />

Conference<br />

Changes in the <strong>Earth</strong> System are approached at three<br />

levels:<br />

● Detection i.e. it can be demonstrated that a change<br />

has happened.<br />

● Attribution i.e. the cause of the change can be<br />

demonstrated.<br />

● Prediction at three levels; a deduction can be drawn<br />

that should be true in general; a statement that if x<br />

happens then y will follow; a statement that x will<br />

happen, i.e. a forecast.<br />

The media do not always distinguish between these different<br />

levels in reporting changes to the <strong>Earth</strong>!<br />

Evidence for carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere:<br />

● Carbon dioxide levels at Mauna Loa and at the South<br />

Pole are rising in parallel.<br />

● Ice cores from the Antarctic show stable levels of<br />

CO 2 from 1000 A.D. to the start of the Industrial<br />

Revolution around 1800, followed by a rapid rise.<br />

● The Vostok (Antarctica) ice cores show an oscillation<br />

in CO 2 content which can be correlated with glacial<br />

and interglacial epochs.<br />

Carbon stores in the <strong>Earth</strong> system are vast, but by far<br />

the greater part lies in the lithosphere, and not simply in<br />

fossil fuels. In the surface carbon cycle, on average,<br />

every molecule of CO 2 goes through a plant every 6<br />

years!<br />

The amount of CO 2 in the atmosphere roughly correlates<br />

with fossil fuel emissions, but not completely.<br />

Carbon flux between ocean and atmosphere and<br />

between land and atmosphere must also be taken into<br />

account, although the factors are difficult to quantify<br />

exactly at present.<br />

The conclusion is that the rise in CO 2 since the<br />

Industrial Revolution has been detected: It can largely<br />

be attributed to rise in emissions from the burning of<br />

fossil fuels: Predictions for the future are dubious.<br />

Gases other than CO 2 also contribute to climate<br />

change. They include methane, nitrogen oxides, CFCs,<br />

water vapour and tropospheric ozone etc. Although less<br />

in quantity, their radiation efficiency is very much<br />

higher than CO 2 , so a little goes a long way in affecting<br />

the average temperature of the <strong>Earth</strong>.<br />

Aerosols (tiny particles in the atmosphere) also have<br />

an effect on global temperatures. Dust and soot absorb<br />

heat, but sulphates, sea salt and some organic compounds<br />

reflect it back into the upper atmosphere, thus<br />

having a cooling effect.<br />

A reconstruction of past global temperatures from<br />

1000 A.D. shows a generally level graph, with perturbations<br />

attributable to solar events and to volcanic eruptions,<br />

but since the 1980s it shows a dramatic rise. The<br />

resultant shape of the curve is referred to as a “hockey<br />

stick” graph.<br />

So, temperature rise since the 1980s has been<br />

detected and it has been attributed to human “forcing”<br />

(accepted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate<br />

Change in 2001). Predictions are very difficult<br />

to make with any confidence, because of the uncertainty<br />

about the effects of aerosols. For example, governments<br />

are encouraging the reduction in emissions<br />

of sulphates for other good reasons, and yet it is sulphates<br />

in the atmosphere which help to keep down<br />

rises in temperature.<br />

Conclusions<br />

● In order to stabilise climate, CO 2 emissions must be<br />

reduced to very low levels.<br />

● Large uncertainties arising from the other factors<br />

outlined above must be reduced.<br />

● The consequences of climate change need to be better<br />

quantified – we still do not really know how<br />

much global warming is dangerous for the vast range<br />

of ecosystems and human activities on the planet.<br />

A copy of the PowerPoint presentation that Professor<br />

Prentice used to illustrate his lecture with at the ESTA<br />

Conference is available on the ESTA website.<br />

Peter Kennett<br />

peter.kennett@tiscali.co.uk<br />

www.esta-uk.org<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!