23.11.2014 Views

Recycling of Low Grade Clothing Waste - Oakdene Hollins

Recycling of Low Grade Clothing Waste - Oakdene Hollins

Recycling of Low Grade Clothing Waste - Oakdene Hollins

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

© <strong>Oakdene</strong> <strong>Hollins</strong> Ltd, Salvation Army Trading Company Ltd<br />

Nonwovens Innovation & Research Institute Ltd September 2006<br />

The Environment Agency, in a letter to a major textile merchant in August<br />

2005, confirmed that:<br />

………for second‐hand clothes to cease to be waste they must:<br />

i. be suitable for continued use as clothes; and<br />

ii. be being exported for sale and/or use as clothes.<br />

It needs to be emphasised that if the clothes are fit for use as clothes but are exported<br />

for shredding/making into dish cloths or for some other application than direct reuse<br />

as clothes, then we’d consider that to be an export <strong>of</strong> waste.<br />

As such, if clothes go through a sorting and quality control process to remove<br />

unsuitable clothes from the higher grade material the clothes cease to be waste and<br />

are therefore not subject to the requirements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Waste</strong> Shipment Regulations<br />

259/93/EC.<br />

The legislation is therefore interpreted by the Environment Agency, for<br />

used textiles, as follows:<br />

• Material from textile banks, either at civic amenity or public sites, is<br />

classed as waste since it is discarded by the original user and is<br />

assumed to contain considerable amounts <strong>of</strong> unusable material.<br />

Transporting and shipping textile bank material, therefore, is only<br />

allowed through a waste carrier’s permit, etc.<br />

• Bags <strong>of</strong> textiles arising from door‐to‐door collections are deemed not to<br />

be waste, because it is expected that they will contain all usable<br />

(wearable) material. In this case it is assumed that the householder<br />

discards clothing with the belief and intention that it will continue to be<br />

used as clothing.<br />

• The same applies to the surplus textiles, unsuitable for re‐sale in the UK<br />

by the charity shops, which are forwarded to the merchants for re‐sale<br />

abroad. This is not waste because it is deemed to have been sorted and<br />

any unusable material to have been removed. Of course, the definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> what is or is not usable lies with the sorter.<br />

• Where a merchant ships used textiles destined for wiper rags or<br />

shredding, then this is waste.<br />

Telephone discussions with the Agency in November 2005 confirmed that<br />

donated clothing, collected from a textile bank, is a discarded material and<br />

as such is classified as waste at the point <strong>of</strong> collection. However, it is noted<br />

that clothing donated directly to a charity shop, or through a door‐to‐door<br />

collector, is not regarded as waste since it is not deemed to be discarded<br />

and is assumed to be suitable for continued use.<br />

The classification <strong>of</strong> textile bank material as waste is disputed by the<br />

merchants who argue that ‘waste’ should be defined by the intention in the<br />

For Defra Page 26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!