23.11.2014 Views

Recycling of Low Grade Clothing Waste - Oakdene Hollins

Recycling of Low Grade Clothing Waste - Oakdene Hollins

Recycling of Low Grade Clothing Waste - Oakdene Hollins

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

© <strong>Oakdene</strong> <strong>Hollins</strong> Ltd, Salvation Army Trading Company Ltd<br />

Nonwovens Innovation & Research Institute Ltd September 2006<br />

These costs assume negligible additional overhead or capital costs such as<br />

separate stillages on collection vehicles and storage. For an authority that is<br />

not already operating a scheme, the costs will be higher. The figures also<br />

assume that no sorting, checking <strong>of</strong> quality, or disposal <strong>of</strong> rubbish found in<br />

the bags is required. Indeed contamination levels in some collection<br />

schemes mean that none <strong>of</strong> the textiles are suitable for re‐use or recycling.<br />

The marginal cost <strong>of</strong> implementing additional collection activity to include<br />

used textiles, therefore, is likely to be considerable, relative to the value <strong>of</strong><br />

the materials collected, even for authorities with existing kerbside recycling<br />

schemes. However, any incremental costs may be <strong>of</strong>fset by the returns<br />

achieved from the sales value <strong>of</strong> the collected material, currently <strong>of</strong> the<br />

order <strong>of</strong> £50 per tonne, and by savings <strong>of</strong> recycling credits.<br />

6.2.3 <strong>Recycling</strong> and Re-use Credits<br />

Currently Local Authorities can opt to pay recycling credits to third party<br />

organisations involved in the diversion <strong>of</strong> materials from the household<br />

waste stream for recycling. This option was extended in April 2006 to<br />

include payment to organisations that re‐use as well as recycle materials.<br />

Because this arrangement is voluntary, its application across the UK is<br />

patchy. To assess the size and extent <strong>of</strong> the payment <strong>of</strong> recycling and re‐use<br />

credits a survey questionnaire was sent to each <strong>of</strong> the 469 Local Authorities<br />

in the UK in June 2006. The results <strong>of</strong> the survey are summarised below:<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> responses 118<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> respondents to total LA’s 25%<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> LA’s paying credits for textiles 58<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> above providing a value for credits paid 46<br />

Average rate <strong>of</strong> credit per tonne <strong>of</strong> diverted £36.47<br />

The percentage <strong>of</strong> LA’s paying credits for textiles therefore is 49% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents to the questionnaire. This figure is considerably higher than<br />

that believed to be the case from anecdotal evidence within the industry,<br />

which is closer to 10%. This finding may be explained by the possibility<br />

that LA’s that do not pay credits are more likely to be those that did not<br />

respond to the survey. In this case, the survey figure would represent a<br />

maximum percentage <strong>of</strong> those LA’s that pay recycling credits for textiles.<br />

The average per tonne paid is comparable with landfill disposal costs and is<br />

therefore seen as a representative figure.<br />

The percentage (<strong>of</strong> respondents) <strong>of</strong> LA’s paying credits for any waste<br />

material varies from 34% to 53% depending on the material collected. Of<br />

the 49% <strong>of</strong> respondents that pay credits for textiles, 71% pay to the benefit<br />

For Defra Page 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!