Genesee County Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan
Genesee County Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan
Genesee County Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
APPENDIX C: SWOT ANALYSIS<br />
especially livestock operations, in close proximity to rural residences. In addition to the<br />
direct costs associated with operational changes, there are additional social costs to this<br />
conflict that include neighbor infighting, nuisance suits, <strong>and</strong> crop damage.<br />
The second threat from current l<strong>and</strong> development pressure comes from the patchwork of<br />
development. As developed parcels leapfrog existing farms, they limit the expansion<br />
capability of existing operations while impacting successful intergenerational transfers.<br />
In addition, the patchwork of farms requires farmers to travel greater distances between<br />
parcels increasing both the time <strong>and</strong> expense of farming.<br />
The third issue involves the quality of l<strong>and</strong> resource being consumed by development.<br />
Due to the radial pattern of development from Baltimore <strong>and</strong> Washington, the <strong>County</strong>’s<br />
best, <strong>and</strong> most productive soil resources are developed at a faster rate than are the less<br />
productive soils. This increases the proportion of marginal soils under cultivation <strong>and</strong><br />
has the potential to limit the efficiency of county farms.<br />
The fourth issue affected by l<strong>and</strong>-use patterns centers on the increase in l<strong>and</strong> value. As a<br />
result of increased dem<strong>and</strong> for l<strong>and</strong>, farmers are forced to compete for l<strong>and</strong> at higher<br />
prices. This impacts both operational costs as well as farm transition.<br />
Regional Competitiveness: While <strong>Genesee</strong> <strong>County</strong> agriculture may not have an absolute<br />
disadvantage compared to regional (outside of New York) competitors, it does face<br />
relative disadvantages in several significant areas: regulatory burden <strong>and</strong> higher cost<br />
structure.<br />
The agricultural <strong>and</strong> work place regulations in New York, in some cases, are significantly<br />
more stringent than nearby state’s. For example, New York has its own pesticide<br />
registration process that may delay or restrict the use of beneficial products. Also, the<br />
State tends to adopt stricter nutrient management <strong>and</strong> workplace regulations.<br />
The cost structure facing <strong>Genesee</strong> <strong>County</strong> farmers is driven by higher tax structure, which<br />
is changing with support from the Governor, <strong>and</strong> high utility costs.<br />
Management Recruitment: Agribusinesses <strong>and</strong>, to a lesser extent, farmers face difficulty<br />
in recruiting qualified technical <strong>and</strong> professional expertise. This is due in large part to the<br />
state’s reputation as business un-friendly <strong>and</strong> a high cost of living. With out changes in<br />
this situation, it will be difficult to maintain a high level of intellectual capacity within the<br />
agricultural industry.<br />
Water Resources: Increased reliance on ground <strong>and</strong> surface water are a regional source<br />
of concern. Aquifers do not respect political boundaries, <strong>and</strong> problems in one jurisdiction<br />
can quickly exp<strong>and</strong> across borders. Salt water intrusion is an example of this issue.<br />
Regulatory Burden: Real or perceived, farmers <strong>and</strong> agribusinesses feel as if they are<br />
under an increasing <strong>and</strong> unsustainable level of regulatory scrutiny. As new levels of<br />
Copyright©, 2000: <strong>Agricultural</strong> & Community Development Services, Inc, Columbia MD 10