02.01.2015 Views

4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway

4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway

4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusions and Recommendations<br />

evidence base on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> mental health promotion activities. This<br />

evidence needs to be made accessible to practitioners and policy makers in<br />

order to inform best practice and policy.<br />

With regard to cross-border collaborative practice, to some extent the evidence<br />

lags behind the practice. Detailed information on implementation and<br />

collaborative forms <strong>of</strong> practice is critical if programme evaluators and<br />

implementers are to maximise learning on programme delivery through<br />

effective cross-border working. Evaluation needs to be incorporated into<br />

programme activity from the outset. This needs to include not only evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> programme inputs, impact and outcomes, but also more detailed focus on<br />

documenting the process <strong>of</strong> implementation and styles <strong>of</strong> working. Improving<br />

the capacity <strong>of</strong> evaluators and practitioners to gather evidence on the process<br />

<strong>of</strong> co-operative working is needed in order to inform the knowledge base in<br />

this area. Pluralistic methods <strong>of</strong> evaluation are recommended in order to<br />

capture the complexities and dynamics <strong>of</strong> co-operative working from the<br />

perspectives <strong>of</strong> the different stakeholders. The building up <strong>of</strong> case studies in<br />

good cross-border collaborative practice on the ground is identified as an area<br />

for further development.<br />

Data Collaboration<br />

• With regard to data collaboration, there is a need for greater co-ordination at<br />

a policy level to ensure that core sets <strong>of</strong> data are recorded North and South in<br />

order to avoid overlap and ensure a certain level <strong>of</strong> compatibility. Comparable<br />

data is required in order to inform ongoing programme planning and policy<br />

development. A joint North-South advisory group to examine existing data<br />

sources and to plan and co-ordinate future studies in this area should be<br />

established.<br />

• The collection <strong>of</strong> data on population level mental health status needs to be<br />

harmonised, both in terms <strong>of</strong> the measures employed and methods <strong>of</strong><br />

administration. The key recommendations from the STAKES report (2001b), as<br />

outlined in Chapter 6, need to be implemented, thereby ensuring compatibility,<br />

not only on an all-island basis, but also with UK and European counterparts. In<br />

particular, the recommendations regarding the collection <strong>of</strong> data on positive<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> mental health need to be considered.<br />

• Both existing and future data sources on population mental health should be<br />

effectively disseminated in an accessible format in order to guide mental health<br />

promotion policy, planning and practice at all levels.<br />

Final Conclusions<br />

Effective collaboration and a sound knowledge and evidence base are essential<br />

elements for the development <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive mental health promotion<br />

strategy. To reduce barriers and create effective cross-border collaboration in this<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!