4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Methodology Lifestyle risk factors relating to mental health and well-being may include cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, dietary habits, physical activity, illegal substance use and body mass. Each of these indicators can be measured using single item or batteries of questions. The accuracy and precision of the selfreported information is affected by the measure used and the way the question is framed. Using the above criteria, the collected data sources were reviewed, examining their comparability and compatibility and identifying strengths and weaknesses in terms of harmonisation. The findings from this section are presented in Chapter 6. Phase 2: Methodology common to Strand A and B Much of the methodology employed in Phase 2 of the project was common to both strands A and B. The core objectives of dissemination of findings, and development of practice and policy which will facilitate cross border collaboration and harmonisation of mental health surveillance, interweave both strands. Therefore, the majority of methods described below relate to both Strand A: Collaborative Mental Health Promotion Practices, and Strand B: Compatibility and Comparability of Mental Health Data. Dissemination of Findings from Phase 1 Interim Report When the interim report was published, copies were sent from the Centre for Cross Border Studies to all who had participated in Phase 1 of the study, including practitioners, voluntary and community groups, researchers and policy makers. Study Day at the Centre for Cross Border Studies Accompanying the interim report was an invitation to attend a study day on 6th September 2001 in the Centre for Cross Border Studies in Armagh. The purpose of this day was to disseminate the findings from Phase 1 and to invite reflections on the information presented. A total of 119 people were invited to attend this study day and 45 people, representing a wide range of interests, including policy makers, health agencies and voluntary and statutory bodies, attended. Presentations based on the findings of Phase 1 were made and these were followed by a group discussion. 25
Methodology Discussion Groups Immediately following these presentations, four structured discussion groups were convened with the 45 people attending the study day to consider the findings and to draw out the implications for policy and practice development. A facilitator and rapporteur attended each group. The questions addressed by the groups were: • What are the aims and expected added value of cross-border collaboration • How do we evaluate current cross-border collaboration • What are the key learning points from current experiences • What are the current barriers to effective cross-border collaboration • Under what conditions could investment in cross-border collaboration become more effective and efficient • How do we further the harmonisation of mental health data collection on the island of Ireland After the sessions the four groups reconvened and their rapporteurs presented a report from each group. This session was recorded and rapporteurs’ notes were given to the project research staff. These notes were later subject to content analysis in order to catalogue views on collaboration, lessons in best practice, mechanisms for cross-border co-operation and key areas and opportunities for future development. The policy and practice results are presented in Chapter 5 and the data compatibility and comparability results are presented in Chapter 6. Based on the findings from this study day, a questionnaire was developed to further explore the views of stakeholders and participants around cross-border working (Appendix 3). Review of Policy Frameworks A review was then carried out of existing health policy and policy developments internationally including the European Union, England, Scotland and Wales. There was a particular focus on mental health and mental health promotion. A review of the international literature was also carried out looking at examples of collaboration, partnership, and inter-sectoral co-operation in health activity and health promotion and their associated evaluations. Roundtable Discussion Day A discussion day was held on the 5th December 2001 at the Department of Health and Children, Dublin. The aims of this discussion were: • To review current policy developments concerning mental health promotion (strategies and data sources) in the UK, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. • To consider the strategic steps required for effective collaboration on the development and implementation of a mental health promotion policy. • To examine recommendations for harmonisation of mental health data at a pan-European level and their implications for developing comparable and compatible population mental health data on an all-island basis. 26
Page 1 and 2: A Report for the Centre For Cross B
Page 3 and 4: About the Authors Dr. Margaret Barr
Page 5 and 6: Acknowledgements We would like to t
Page 7 and 8: Introductory comments by the Depart
Page 10 and 11: Background and Rationale 1 There is
Page 12 and 13: Background and Rationale of mental
Page 14 and 15: Background and Rationale underlined
Page 16 and 17: Background and Rationale • Produc
Page 18 and 19: Project Aims and Objectives 2 This
Page 20 and 21: Methodology 3 Phase 1: Methodology
Page 22 and 23: Methodology semi-structured intervi
Page 24 and 25: Methodology Methods for Review and
Page 28 and 29: Methodology • To identify the str
Page 30 and 31: Findings from the Investigation of
Page 62: Findings from the Investigation of
Page 65 and 66: Collaborative Practice and Policy
Page 67 and 68: Collaborative Practice and Policy t
Page 69 and 70: Collaborative Practice and Policy o
Page 71 and 72: Collaborative Practice and Policy R
Page 73 and 74: Collaborative Practice and Policy c
Page 75 and 76: Collaborative Practice and Policy T
Page 77 and 78:
Collaborative Practice and Policy o
Page 79 and 80:
Collaborative Practice and Policy B
Page 81 and 82:
Collaborative Practice and Policy f
Page 83 and 84:
Collaborative Practice and Policy A
Page 85 and 86:
Collaborative Practice and Policy O
Page 87 and 88:
Collaborative Practice and Policy T
Page 89 and 90:
Collaborative Practice and Policy o
Page 91 and 92:
Collaborative Practice and Policy A
Page 93 and 94:
Collaborative Practice and Policy W
Page 96 and 97:
Findings from the Compatibility and
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Conclusions and Recommendations 7 G
Page 126 and 127:
Conclusions and Recommendations Dat
Page 128 and 129:
Conclusions and Recommendations The
Page 130 and 131:
Conclusions and Recommendations pos
Page 132 and 133:
Conclusions and Recommendations are
Page 134 and 135:
References Adult Mental Health Serv
Page 136 and 137:
References Department of Health and
Page 138 and 139:
References Health Education Board f
Page 140 and 141:
References Layte, R., Jenkinson, C.
Page 142 and 143:
References Sindall, C. (1997) Inter
Page 144 and 145:
Promoting Positive Mental Health: C
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Promoting Positive Mental Health an
Page 156 and 157:
Promoting Positive Mental Health an
Page 158 and 159:
Organisations which contributed to
Page 160 and 161:
159
Page 162:
The Centre for Cross Border Studies
show all

4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?