4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway
4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway
4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Findings from the Investigation <strong>of</strong><br />
Cross-Border Collaborative <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />
Promotion Practices<br />
<strong>Report</strong>ed Barriers and Difficulties<br />
Project members were questioned concerning difficulties or barriers experienced<br />
in relation to successful collaborative work. A wide range <strong>of</strong> views were<br />
expressed, even between members <strong>of</strong> the same project. However a number <strong>of</strong><br />
interesting issues were raised in the course <strong>of</strong> the interviews. These include the<br />
following:<br />
• Issues <strong>of</strong> shared ownership were raised, particularly where partners from one<br />
side <strong>of</strong> the border may have developed the original idea for the project. The<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> having some initial preparatory work to agree on the<br />
expectations <strong>of</strong> cross-border working from the outset was highlighted. It was<br />
also felt that this would aid in defining the nature <strong>of</strong> true cross-border work.<br />
• Building up <strong>of</strong> trust between the partner groups was highlighted as being<br />
critically important, and the need for a recognition that this was a slow<br />
process that takes time. Feelings <strong>of</strong> rivalry and competition between the crossborder<br />
partners were also expressed, particularly at the early stages <strong>of</strong> project<br />
development.<br />
• Constraints in terms <strong>of</strong> resources were also mentioned as difficulties, including<br />
distance/geographical spread and the time taken in getting all partners<br />
together at regular intervals.<br />
• Funding was also mentioned as a difficulty, particularly in relation to<br />
uncertainty about future funding and how this negatively affects planning.<br />
There was a general appreciation that cross-border working takes time and<br />
that, given the complexity <strong>of</strong> the mental health area, sustained ongoing<br />
action is needed. Continuity <strong>of</strong> funding is perceived as being critical to this<br />
endeavour.<br />
• The need for better co-ordination across the two jurisdictions was also<br />
commented on, particularly with regard to differences in the structure and<br />
working practices <strong>of</strong> the two health care systems North and South.<br />
It is clear from the case study pr<strong>of</strong>iles that there is a general awareness among<br />
project members that many organisations North and South are serving the same<br />
population needs and targeting the same groups <strong>of</strong> people. As commented by<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the people interviewed, within the CAWT area cross-border co-operation<br />
is now a way <strong>of</strong> working, not just a once <strong>of</strong>f experience, and is regarded as being<br />
very much the way forward. Working on a cross-border basis is viewed by some<br />
project members as not being any different from working on a cross-board or<br />
cross-sectoral basis, as the same issues <strong>of</strong> partnership and collaboration are<br />
involved. The view was expressed that all involved in the area <strong>of</strong> mental health<br />
promotion are confronting the same issues North and South, and that it makes<br />
sense to pool resources, expertise and experience in order to promote best<br />
practice in the area.<br />
60