4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Findings from the Compatibility and Comparability of Mental Health and Related Health Data Sources Self-rated General Health Most commonly used general health measures related to self-rated general health, with nine surveys (six in Republic and three in Northern Ireland) recording this information using some level of Likert type scale. The Northern Ireland Survey of Health and Social Wellbeing used the following question within the SF- 36 scale: In general would you say your health is: Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 1 2 3 4 5 The National Health and Lifestyle Survey and the Living in Ireland Survey in the Republic of Ireland asked this question in exactly the same way, although not as part of the SF-36. Each of the remaining adult surveys used the same measure for general health and the children’s HBSC survey used a similar three-point scale. General Health Status and Quality of Life Health status was also commonly recorded with seven surveys doing so (five in the Republic and two in Northern Ireland). Two different generic health status measures were used for this purpose, the EuroQoL-5D and the SF-36. The EuroQoL-5D is a generic multi-dimensional health profile, which includes five domains; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Overall perceived health status is also recorded on a visual analogue scale of 1-100 (EuroQoL group 1990). The Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey scale comprises 36 items which measure the following eight dimensions: physical functioning, role limitations (physical), role limitations (social), social functioning, mental health, energy/vitality, pain and general health perception. This widely used scale has been found to have good psychometric properties (Ware et al. 1993). Four studies in the Republic measured quality of life using a combination of the WHOQoL-BREF, single item Likert scale and the SEIQoL scale. There were no such measures in any of the Northern Ireland surveys. The recently developed UK WHOQoL-BREF instrument (WHOQoL Group 1998) is an abbreviated version of the WHOQoL-100 quality of life assessment. There are 26 individual items in the WHOQoL-BREF that represent four domains related to quality of life: physical health, psychological, social relationships and environment. The psychological dimension covers a number of mental health related items. The single Likert scale used was the following and was taken from the WHOQoL-BREF. 97
Findings from the Compatibility and Comparability of Mental Health and Related Health Data Sources How would you rate your quality of life: Very poor Poor Neither poor nor good Good Very good 1 2 3 4 5 The Schedule for Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL) is an Irish developed scale which measures general quality of life from the perspective of the individual respondent (Browne et al. 1997). The individual names five areas most important to their quality of life, describes current functioning in each of the areas and outlines the relative weighting or importance they give to each area in their judgement of quality of life. Psychological distress Psychological distress was measured by seven surveys (four in Republic and two in North) each using the GHQ-12. The GHQ-12, a widely applied instrument to indicate psychological distress, is the short form of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) designed by Goldberg (1978) as a self-administered instrument for use in community settings. The cross national survey also measured psychological well-being using the Questionnaire on Resources and Stress (QRS-F) and life satisfaction using the Philadelphia Geriatric Centre Morale Scale. Many of the other mental health indicators were recorded by single surveys only. Mental and Physical Health Problems Each national survey recorded information relating to self-reported mental and physical health morbidity and health service utilisation. As was also the case in the regional or specific population surveys, reported diagnosis of depression and anxiety were the most commonly noted mental health problems. Those needing mental health services were identified in the Health and Social Services for Older People survey using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS). Among the depression scales used in individual surveys were the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (Zung 1965) and the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (Radloff 1977). Physical morbidity was mainly recorded using the long term limiting illness indicator. Social Support and Stress Measures The Northern Ireland Survey of Health and Social Wellbeing survey used the same perceived social support seven item scale as that in the Health Survey for England 1994. However, there was no such comparable measure in the National Health and Lifestyle Survey in the Republic of Ireland. Respondents were asked about their perceived level of stress in the past year in the Northern Ireland national survey but not in the Republic’s. 98
Page 1 and 2:
A Report for the Centre For Cross B
Page 3 and 4:
About the Authors Dr. Margaret Barr
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgements We would like to t
Page 7 and 8:
Introductory comments by the Depart
Page 10 and 11:
Background and Rationale 1 There is
Page 12 and 13:
Background and Rationale of mental
Page 14 and 15:
Background and Rationale underlined
Page 16 and 17:
Background and Rationale • Produc
Page 18 and 19:
Project Aims and Objectives 2 This
Page 20 and 21:
Methodology 3 Phase 1: Methodology
Page 22 and 23:
Methodology semi-structured intervi
Page 24 and 25:
Methodology Methods for Review and
Page 26 and 27:
Methodology Lifestyle risk factors
Page 28 and 29:
Methodology • To identify the str
Page 30 and 31:
Findings from the Investigation of
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49: Findings from the Investigation of
Page 62: Findings from the Investigation of
Page 65 and 66: Collaborative Practice and Policy
Page 67 and 68: Collaborative Practice and Policy t
Page 69 and 70: Collaborative Practice and Policy o
Page 71 and 72: Collaborative Practice and Policy R
Page 73 and 74: Collaborative Practice and Policy c
Page 75 and 76: Collaborative Practice and Policy T
Page 79 and 80: Collaborative Practice and Policy B
Page 81 and 82: Collaborative Practice and Policy f
Page 83 and 84: Collaborative Practice and Policy A
Page 85 and 86: Collaborative Practice and Policy O
Page 87 and 88: Collaborative Practice and Policy T
Page 91 and 92: Collaborative Practice and Policy A
Page 93 and 94: Collaborative Practice and Policy W
Page 96 and 97: Findings from the Compatibility and
Page 124 and 125: Conclusions and Recommendations 7 G
Page 126 and 127: Conclusions and Recommendations Dat
Page 128 and 129: Conclusions and Recommendations The
Page 130 and 131: Conclusions and Recommendations pos
Page 132 and 133: Conclusions and Recommendations are
Page 134 and 135: References Adult Mental Health Serv
Page 136 and 137: References Department of Health and
Page 138 and 139: References Health Education Board f
Page 140 and 141: References Layte, R., Jenkinson, C.
Page 142 and 143: References Sindall, C. (1997) Inter
Page 144 and 145: Promoting Positive Mental Health: C
Page 146 and 147: Promoting Positive Mental Health: C
Page 148 and 149:
Promoting Positive Mental Health: C
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Promoting Positive Mental Health an
Page 156 and 157:
Promoting Positive Mental Health an
Page 158 and 159:
Organisations which contributed to
Page 160 and 161:
159
Page 162:
The Centre for Cross Border Studies
show all

4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?