4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Findings from the Investigation of Cross-Border Collaborative Mental Health Promotion Practices The perceived benefits of cross-border working include the following: • Exchange of ideas and effective practices including sharing resources in terms of expertise, time and costs. Clearly project members perceive many benefits to cross-border working as the following comments illustrate: The project had many benefits including the exchange of ideas and effective practice, learning from each other and sharing resources... and... the establishing of multidisciplinary networks and training on a cross-border basis. Increased understanding, learning and sharing are all important benefits. The interaction between professionals was inspiring. The enthusiasm displayed by all health care professionals was evident in their willingness to share ideas and thoughts and to develop a model of best practice. • Establishing relationships and networks across disciplines, professionals, communities, service users and organisations on a cross-border basis. The benefits of working with like-minded people were underscored with an awareness that even though health workers may be working across different health systems, they are addressing the same issues. Within the CAWT area cross-border working is now a way of working, not just an experience...it is very much the way forward. ...realising that all involved are confronting the same issues and that there are no real differences between their jobs, North and South. The cross-border projects are seen as strengthening existing relationships and leading to new ones being established. Most project members report high levels of enthusiasm and good co-operation among the participating organisations and individual workers. The group has worked cohesively and there has been a sense of value and importance to the work. • All were of the opinion that there was scope for expansion and many saw the opportunity for developing new proposals and projects based on their experiences to date in the current projects. The network has now been established and it would be important to build on this and develop other proposals. Cross-border collaboration is clearly perceived as an opportunity for developing and promoting best practice on an all-island basis. 59
Findings from the Investigation of Cross-Border Collaborative Mental Health Promotion Practices Reported Barriers and Difficulties Project members were questioned concerning difficulties or barriers experienced in relation to successful collaborative work. A wide range of views were expressed, even between members of the same project. However a number of interesting issues were raised in the course of the interviews. These include the following: • Issues of shared ownership were raised, particularly where partners from one side of the border may have developed the original idea for the project. The importance of having some initial preparatory work to agree on the expectations of cross-border working from the outset was highlighted. It was also felt that this would aid in defining the nature of true cross-border work. • Building up of trust between the partner groups was highlighted as being critically important, and the need for a recognition that this was a slow process that takes time. Feelings of rivalry and competition between the crossborder partners were also expressed, particularly at the early stages of project development. • Constraints in terms of resources were also mentioned as difficulties, including distance/geographical spread and the time taken in getting all partners together at regular intervals. • Funding was also mentioned as a difficulty, particularly in relation to uncertainty about future funding and how this negatively affects planning. There was a general appreciation that cross-border working takes time and that, given the complexity of the mental health area, sustained ongoing action is needed. Continuity of funding is perceived as being critical to this endeavour. • The need for better co-ordination across the two jurisdictions was also commented on, particularly with regard to differences in the structure and working practices of the two health care systems North and South. It is clear from the case study profiles that there is a general awareness among project members that many organisations North and South are serving the same population needs and targeting the same groups of people. As commented by one of the people interviewed, within the CAWT area cross-border co-operation is now a way of working, not just a once off experience, and is regarded as being very much the way forward. Working on a cross-border basis is viewed by some project members as not being any different from working on a cross-board or cross-sectoral basis, as the same issues of partnership and collaboration are involved. The view was expressed that all involved in the area of mental health promotion are confronting the same issues North and South, and that it makes sense to pool resources, expertise and experience in order to promote best practice in the area. 60
Page 1 and 2:
A Report for the Centre For Cross B
Page 3 and 4:
About the Authors Dr. Margaret Barr
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgements We would like to t
Page 7 and 8:
Introductory comments by the Depart
Page 10 and 11: Background and Rationale 1 There is
Page 12 and 13: Background and Rationale of mental
Page 14 and 15: Background and Rationale underlined
Page 16 and 17: Background and Rationale • Produc
Page 18 and 19: Project Aims and Objectives 2 This
Page 20 and 21: Methodology 3 Phase 1: Methodology
Page 22 and 23: Methodology semi-structured intervi
Page 24 and 25: Methodology Methods for Review and
Page 26 and 27: Methodology Lifestyle risk factors
Page 28 and 29: Methodology • To identify the str
Page 30 and 31: Findings from the Investigation of
Page 62: Findings from the Investigation of
Page 65 and 66: Collaborative Practice and Policy
Page 67 and 68: Collaborative Practice and Policy t
Page 69 and 70: Collaborative Practice and Policy o
Page 71 and 72: Collaborative Practice and Policy R
Page 73 and 74: Collaborative Practice and Policy c
Page 75 and 76: Collaborative Practice and Policy T
Page 79 and 80: Collaborative Practice and Policy B
Page 81 and 82: Collaborative Practice and Policy f
Page 83 and 84: Collaborative Practice and Policy A
Page 85 and 86: Collaborative Practice and Policy O
Page 87 and 88: Collaborative Practice and Policy T
Page 91 and 92: Collaborative Practice and Policy A
Page 93 and 94: Collaborative Practice and Policy W
Page 96 and 97: Findings from the Compatibility and
Page 110 and 111:
Findings from the Compatibility and
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Conclusions and Recommendations 7 G
Page 126 and 127:
Conclusions and Recommendations Dat
Page 128 and 129:
Conclusions and Recommendations The
Page 130 and 131:
Conclusions and Recommendations pos
Page 132 and 133:
Conclusions and Recommendations are
Page 134 and 135:
References Adult Mental Health Serv
Page 136 and 137:
References Department of Health and
Page 138 and 139:
References Health Education Board f
Page 140 and 141:
References Layte, R., Jenkinson, C.
Page 142 and 143:
References Sindall, C. (1997) Inter
Page 144 and 145:
Promoting Positive Mental Health: C
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Promoting Positive Mental Health an
Page 156 and 157:
Promoting Positive Mental Health an
Page 158 and 159:
Organisations which contributed to
Page 160 and 161:
159
Page 162:
The Centre for Cross Border Studies
show all

4858 Mental Health Report - National University of Ireland, Galway

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?