Northwest Florida State College RN to BSN Nursing Program

Program Evaluation and Assessment Plan
Key
Element
II-F
III-A
III-B
Program Component Evaluation Benchmark Methods of Evaluation Responsible
Committee
or Party
dossiers (department files)
Faculty roles:
Teaching
Scholarship
Service
Practice congruency
Curriculum organization
and expected student
learning outcomes:
program mission, goals,
and expected outcomes
Curriculum development,
implementation, revision:
professional
standards/guidelines
reflective of professional
nursing
standards/guidelines;
Analysis reflects teaching,
scholarship and service of
faculty
Curriculum developed
from mission, philosophy
and objectives; reflects
expected student outcomes
and professional
standards/guidelines
Curriculum development,
implementation, revision
reflects/congruent with
professional
standards/guidelines
of professional nursing
Performance evaluations
reflect strengths, areas of
improvement and
goals/plan for
professional development
(on file in HR)
Performance evaluations
Student Evaluation of
Instruction
Appointment /election
letters; letters of
appreciation/
Review of faculty and
curriculum committee
minutes, students
grades/progression,
course evaluations by
students and input from
students
Analysis of AACN
Essentials
ANA Code of Ethics,
Standards of Practice and
Course syllabi,
Student course grades
and evaluations (theory
Faculty
members and
Program
Director
Curriculum
Committees
(department
and college)
Student
Affairs
Committee
Faculty
Curriculum
Committees
(department
and college)
Scheduled
Review
Annually
(May) and
each semester
as appropriate
Ongoing as
needed and
annually in
May
End of each
semester
Ongoing as
needed and
annually in
May
Dissemination of
Results
Results of evaluation
reported to individual
faculty members,
Faculty-as-a-Whole,
and Program Advisory
Committee.
Aggregate data reported
to Advisory committee,
college & FLDOE
Aggregate data reported
to Advisory Committee,
college Curriculum
Committee & FLDOE
Action and Followup
appropriate actions
taken to assure faculty
meet or exceed
benchmark.
If benchmark is not
met, analysis will be
communicated to
faculty and
appropriate action will
be taken to assure
faculty are provided
ample opportunities to
assure they meet all
faculty roles. If
faculty do not take
advantage of
opportunities then
reassignment will be
discussed with faculty
member.
If expected student
learning outcomes do
not meet benchmarks,
the faculty will devise
a plan to improve the
curriculum as needed.
If expected student
learning outcomes do
not meet benchmarks,
the faculty will devise
a plan to improve the
curriculum as needed.
Northwest Florida State College Self-Study Report Appendices, August 20, 2008 Page 28 of 42