12.01.2015 Views

Download a digital copy (1.5 MB) - Open Door Community

Download a digital copy (1.5 MB) - Open Door Community

Download a digital copy (1.5 MB) - Open Door Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

182 ˜ A Work of Hospitality, 1982–2002<br />

not to investigate who had murdered this child In other words, to send Gary<br />

Nelson to death row was to say, “We care more about appearing to have gotten<br />

somebody than we do about stopping the murderer of Valerie Armstrong.”<br />

Gary Nelson got off death row. But the odds were more than likely that he<br />

would have been executed. How often does a private lawyer with the skills and<br />

commitment of an Emmet Bondurant volunteer to take a “hopeless” deathpenalty<br />

case How many lawyers and law firms have half a million dollars’ worth<br />

of time that they are willing to give for an indigent African American man condemned<br />

to die<br />

The death penalty raises hundreds of moral, ethical, practical, and religious<br />

problems. It is part of a criminal-control system that is leading us farther away<br />

from, rather than toward, a safe and just society.<br />

I met a post-office employee in 1977 who looked hard at the button on my<br />

jacket (“Why Do We Kill People Who Kill People to Show That Killing People<br />

Is Wrong”). He said, “I only have one reason to oppose the death penalty.” He<br />

went on to tell me of a man in the small Georgia town where he had grown up<br />

who was wrongly convicted and sentenced to die. The prisoner was later exonerated<br />

and, like Gary X. Nelson, released. “But the risk of making a mistake like<br />

that,” said the man behind the counter, “is too much of a risk to take.” The man<br />

in the post office was right. Everybody makes mistakes. When the life of a<br />

human being is at stake, it’s too much of a risk.<br />

What about the Victims by Murphy Davis<br />

O c t o b e r 1 9 8 8<br />

“But what about the victims!” is a question that comes often to those of us<br />

who oppose the death penalty. The tone of the question varies, but whether<br />

searching or hostile in tone, the question has always grieved me because of the<br />

implied assumption that to oppose further violence is to be against those hurt<br />

by crime and violence.<br />

This is a very personal issue for us at the <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong>. Our life makes it impossible<br />

to cut sharp lines between the victims and perpetrators of crime. We live<br />

every day with those who suffer because of violent crime and those who suffer<br />

because of the violent punishment of crime. The pressing question, it seems to<br />

me, is how can we live in a way that brings healing to the broken victims and<br />

that creates fewer victims

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!