12.01.2015 Views

Download a digital copy (1.5 MB) - Open Door Community

Download a digital copy (1.5 MB) - Open Door Community

Download a digital copy (1.5 MB) - Open Door Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

342 ˜ Afterword<br />

weaving of influences shaping the <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong> has the common thread of the<br />

Catholic Worker.<br />

Thus, after reading this collection of articles from Hospitality, a useful way<br />

to summarize and to gain a perspective on the <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong> <strong>Community</strong> is to see<br />

how it expresses central themes and practices within the Catholic Worker movement.<br />

In a helpful essay published as an introduction to a new edition of<br />

Dorothy Day’s book On Pilgrimage, Mark and Louise Zwick, themselves<br />

Catholic Workers, discuss what might be called ten essential characteristics of<br />

the Catholic Worker movement. 1<br />

The first of those characteristics, a deep connection with yet critical stance toward<br />

the church, is especially evident in the lives of Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin,<br />

and continues as an important aspect of the Catholic Worker movement. As<br />

the Zwicks state, “Dorothy Day was not an isolated Catholic, sitting on the edge<br />

or margin of mainline Catholicism, or [as] part of a sectarian group that lives<br />

content in the discovery of its own little truths that it keeps under a bushel. ...<br />

Her radicalism, her commitment to the poor, to a just social order, to peace—<br />

all were rooted in her Catholicism.” 2 At the same time, Day and the Catholic<br />

Worker movement have been very critical of the institutional church on certain<br />

points. At one point in her life, Day wrote, “I loved the Church for Christ made<br />

visible. Not for itself, because it was often a scandal to me. Romano Guardini<br />

said that the Church is the Cross on which Christ was crucified; one could not<br />

separate Christ from his Cross, and one must live in a state of permanent dissatisfaction<br />

with the Church.” 3<br />

This tension between love for and criticism of the church is clearly present<br />

in the <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong>. Those who began the community were driven by a shared<br />

intensity of faith that first helped to reinvigorate a small Presbyterian congregation,<br />

and that then led to starting a night shelter. Yet that same intensity of faith<br />

eventually led to the formation of a type of Christian community seemingly not<br />

possible within the confines of a traditional congregation. The very existence of<br />

a community such as the <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong> thus has come to stand as a critical alternative<br />

to mainstream Christian life. In the <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong>, and in other intentional<br />

Christian communities, members’ lives are organized around a community seeking<br />

to live faithfully to the gospel. Rival institutional and personal demands such<br />

as family, work, education, and politics are minimized. In mainstream Christian<br />

lives, the temptation is more easily indulged to put personal and institutional<br />

loyalties before faithful response to the gospel as nurtured within Christian community<br />

and offered in witness to the world. Even more, mainstream Christianity<br />

can come to justify accommodation with the dominant institutional struc-<br />

1. See Mark and Louise Zwick, “Dorothy Day and the Catholic Worker Movement,”<br />

in Dorothy Day, On Pilgrimage (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1999).<br />

2. Ibid., 18.<br />

3. Ibid., 14.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!