enhanced-commonwealth-performance-framework-discussion-paper
enhanced-commonwealth-performance-framework-discussion-paper
enhanced-commonwealth-performance-framework-discussion-paper
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3 Possible future options<br />
3.1 Inclusion of <strong>performance</strong> plans in the Portfolio Budget Statements<br />
This section introduces the <strong>performance</strong> plan—<strong>performance</strong> planning information that could<br />
be included in the Portfolio Budget Statements in a flexible format that reflects the nature<br />
and design of entities’ programmes. Here, we discuss the rationale for introducing the<br />
<strong>performance</strong> plan and detail the various elements that could be included.<br />
The <strong>performance</strong> plan is intended to clearly outline what entities are doing, what they are<br />
seeking to achieve and how they plan to report on their achievements. Performance<br />
measurement tools and methodologies should be identified at the beginning of the reporting<br />
cycle.<br />
We are seeking your views on whether <strong>performance</strong> plans should be developed and<br />
introduced over time, what information should be included in them and how they can best be<br />
used by entities and the Parliament.<br />
In addition to the options discussed in Section 2.1 <strong>performance</strong> information could be included in<br />
the Portfolio Budget Statements in a modified format and be known as a ‘<strong>performance</strong> plan’. The<br />
<strong>performance</strong> plan would be presented in a flexible format that reflects the nature and design of<br />
each entity’s programmes.<br />
This section discusses our rationale for introducing <strong>performance</strong> plans and explores the various<br />
elements that could be included in them. The <strong>discussion</strong> is designed to test the notion that the<br />
front-end planning for <strong>performance</strong> measurement activities and priorities at the entity level<br />
could be improved.<br />
Performance plans could help to address some of the criticisms associated with measuring the<br />
outcome or effectiveness of Commonwealth programmes, and would draw a direct link to<br />
annual <strong>performance</strong> statements.<br />
Under this proposal, <strong>performance</strong> plans could replace the information currently presented<br />
under section 2 of the Portfolio Budget Statements. All programmes listed in the Central Budget<br />
Management System and all other major activities 9 of an entity would require a <strong>performance</strong><br />
plan, noting that the level of information provided should reflect the nature, complexity, risk<br />
and profile of the activity. It is anticipated that some activities would be described in<br />
considerable detail, whereas others would be described briefly.<br />
Performance plans would clearly identify what entities are doing, what they are seeking to<br />
achieve and how they will report the non-financial <strong>performance</strong> information that relates to<br />
what they actually did achieve. The plan would outline how the programme or activity would be<br />
measured and would draw on the full range of tools and approaches to assessing <strong>performance</strong>.<br />
Importantly, <strong>performance</strong> plans would allow for an upfront <strong>discussion</strong> with stakeholders about<br />
the appropriateness and effectiveness of particular <strong>performance</strong> measures and methodologies<br />
at the beginning of the reporting cycle. Hopefully, this will assist entities in identifying<br />
significant issues regarding how <strong>performance</strong> would be measured before the reporting year<br />
comes to an end.<br />
9 Subsequent references to programmes should be read as programmes and all major activities.<br />
Enhanced Commonwealth Performance Framework—Discussion Paper | 26