12.01.2015 Views

enhanced-commonwealth-performance-framework-discussion-paper

enhanced-commonwealth-performance-framework-discussion-paper

enhanced-commonwealth-performance-framework-discussion-paper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Attachment H: Shared outcomes—key lessons<br />

In response to ongoing concerns that the existing <strong>performance</strong> <strong>framework</strong> imposes barriers to<br />

effective cross-portfolio and cross-sector working arrangements, Finance initiated a series of<br />

trials with selected portfolios to try to develop mechanisms to overcome the methodological<br />

challenges associated with measuring government activities of this nature. Over recent years,<br />

Finance has worked with various portfolios to better measure cross-portfolio activities.<br />

This work has provided useful insights into how to conduct a successful shared outcome<br />

assessment, as well as the challenges associated with such collaborative approaches. Key<br />

lessons from the trials, supplemented by information from a range of other academic sources,<br />

suggest that the following factors are important to the success of shared outcome processes:<br />

• high-level commitment and support from relevant Ministers and senior management to<br />

engender and promote collaborative working arrangements and maintain momentum<br />

throughout the process<br />

• a logical fit of objectives with the strategic purpose of entities involved 10<br />

• entities agree and clearly define responsibility and accountability for specific policy<br />

objectives contributing to the shared outcome, including the establishment of reporting<br />

and funding arrangements<br />

• flexibility and willingness to reprioritise as required to meet overarching goals, balanced<br />

against the need to meet individual entity priorities<br />

• clearly defined expectations of the project, including specification of KPIs, milestones<br />

and outputs<br />

• a clearly identified, shared working project manager or partner for each entity, and<br />

clarification of the roles and responsibilities of each entity<br />

• clear identification of the resourcing requirements and obligations of each party<br />

• definition of the governance, accountability, oversight and scrutiny arrangements<br />

• development of mechanisms and systems for the management of risks and reviews<br />

• establishment of dispute resolution processes<br />

• a communication and relationship management strategy, with clear reporting<br />

commitments<br />

• consideration of the potential role of an external scrutineer, including the mechanism by<br />

which the scrutineer would report back their observations and recommendations.<br />

10 The ANAO’s Audit Report No. 29 2009–10—Effective Cross-Agency Agreements—reported that where<br />

the purpose of an entity’s involvement in a shared outcome project is not articulated within that entity’s<br />

Administrative Arrangements Order, it is difficult for collaboration to occur.<br />

Enhanced Commonwealth Performance Framework—Discussion Paper | 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!