enhanced-commonwealth-performance-framework-discussion-paper

3.2 Future options for evaluation
Here we consider how, in the future, entities could further develop their reporting in the
annual performance statements. We could work with entities to develop new methodologies
for monitoring and evaluating Commonwealth programmes.
We propose that the programme logic model presented in this section could be the basis for
guidance material for a monitoring and evaluation framework.
Performance information in the Portfolio Budget Statements and annual performance
statements should relate to each other so that there is a clear link between the two. A future
development of the annual performance statements could require entities to report against the
short-, medium- and long-term expected results identified in each programme performance
plan. Entities would need to expand on these results in their annual reports.
As part of future options for the enhanced performance framework, Finance could work with
entities to build on better practice to identify methodologies for monitoring and evaluating the
breadth and variety of Commonwealth programmes.
Guidance material for a monitoring and evaluation framework could be based on the
programme logic model represented in Figure 3. The purpose of the model is to link the
objectives of a programme through to its impacts—taking into consideration inputs and outputs
(some versions of this model include processes between inputs and outputs). The idea is that
different methodologies are used to review the programme at different points in the cycle.
In the model, evaluation is undertaken throughout the cycle. For different programme types, the
main focus of the evaluation could occur at different times in the cycle. For service delivery
programmes, the focus would be on process including evaluating inputs and outputs. For a
grants programme, the main focus of evaluation would be on outcomes.
Figure 3: Programme logic model
Enhanced Commonwealth Performance Framework—Discussion Paper | 32