16.01.2015 Views

R&M Data Center Handbook

R&M Data Center Handbook

R&M Data Center Handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

www.datacenter.rdm.com<br />

3.4.2. End of Row (EoR) / Dual End of Row<br />

In an End of Row architecture, a group of server cabinets is supplied by one or more switches. <strong>Data</strong> cables are<br />

installed in a star pattern from the switches to the individual server cabinets. This is generally 3 cables (LAN, SAN,<br />

KVM) for each server, or 5 for redundant LAN & SAN connections. For 32 1U servers, this would then require at<br />

least 96 data cables per cabinet.<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

........<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

PATCH<br />

Aggregation<br />

& Core<br />

SAN<br />

Application Server or Storage Library<br />

SAN Connection<br />

LAN Connection<br />

KVM Connection<br />

Uplink<br />

SAN Switch<br />

LAN Switch<br />

KVM Switch<br />

Since 2010, the performance of virtualized servers has increased dramatically through the systematic introduction<br />

of SR-IOV (Single Root I/O Virtualization) by leading processor manufacturers. Up to that point, data throughput in<br />

virtualized systems was limited to 3 – 4 Gbit/s, and even less than 1 Gbit/s during continuous operation. A doubled<br />

1 GbE connection was therefore the right solution.<br />

The modern alternative is to directly connect servers to high-performance aggregation switches. This solution is<br />

possible because I/O performance in a virtualized system is currently about 20 – 30 Gbit/s, since the hypervisor<br />

(the virtualization software which creates an environment for virtual machines) is freed up from tasks of switching<br />

wherever possible, through SR-IOV and a suitable piece of hardware. There are server blades where, in order to<br />

reach their full potential, a single blade must be connected doubly to 10 GbE. Blade systems that have a total of<br />

up to 8 blade servers must therefore be connected to 100 GbE.<br />

Blade system manufacturers report they are currently working on improving inner aggregation, so a 100 GbE<br />

connection is expected to be offered by 2011. A conventional ToR structure design would therefore be completely<br />

overloaded.<br />

In addition, no cost-effective switches are available on the market which provide the necessary flexibility and can<br />

be equipped with new, high-quality control functions such as DCB, which only make sense when they work endto-end.<br />

An EoR structure therefore has the following features.<br />

Advantages:<br />

Disadvantages:<br />

• Flexible, scalable solution (future-proof) • Greater cable volume in horizontal cabling<br />

• Optimal LAN port assignment (efficient) • Many cable patchings for EoR switches (server and<br />

• Concentration of Access Switches<br />

uplink ports)<br />

(simplified moves/adds/changes)<br />

• Space optimization in racks for server<br />

expansion<br />

Page 60 of 156 © 08/2011 Reichle & De-Massari AG R&M <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Center</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong> V2.0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!