- Page 2:
DEDICATION To Keith Moody WEED SCIE
- Page 5 and 6:
The International Rice Research Ins
- Page 7 and 8:
Bioherbicides and weed management i
- Page 9 and 10:
ful insects caused adverse response
- Page 11 and 12:
The need to raise yields and mainta
- Page 13 and 14:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Any volume that dra
- Page 16:
Overview
- Page 19 and 20:
as more lucrative, full-time job op
- Page 21 and 22:
Table 3. Herbicide use in rice prod
- Page 23 and 24:
only 3.3:1. The benefit-cost ratio
- Page 25 and 26:
EFFECTS ON SOCIETY AND ECOSYSTEMS S
- Page 27 and 28:
mulate in soils and in water tables
- Page 29 and 30:
unds from the field into canals and
- Page 31 and 32:
tion. Even if herbicide mixtures ar
- Page 33 and 34:
plant pathogens for controlling gra
- Page 35 and 36:
spectrum herbicides glufosinate-amm
- Page 37 and 38:
De Datta SK. 1981. Principles and p
- Page 39 and 40:
Li KM, Li PZ. 1996. Effect of herbi
- Page 41 and 42:
Vongsaroj P. 1994. Weed control in
- Page 43 and 44:
i ce env ironments and how they res
- Page 45 and 46:
Soil fertility. Monochoria vaginali
- Page 47 and 48:
Such problems could be avoided by a
- Page 49 and 50:
Ho NK, Md Zuki I. 1988. Weed popula
- Page 52 and 53:
HERBICIDES IN UNITED STATES RICE PR
- Page 54 and 55:
LOSSES TO WEEDS IN U.S. RICE US. ri
- Page 56 and 57:
propanil, which remains the backbon
- Page 58 and 59:
4. U.S. rice yields and adoption of
- Page 60 and 61:
6. Use of herbicides to control bro
- Page 62 and 63:
8. Thiobencarb and molinate transpo
- Page 64 and 65:
oping programs that curtail negativ
- Page 66 and 67:
Dunshee CF, Jones JW. 1924. Results
- Page 68:
Impacts of herbicides
- Page 71 and 72: Pesticide users The pesticide user
- Page 73 and 74: Table 3. Frequency of pesticide app
- Page 75 and 76: Poly- Multiple Eye Pulmonary neurop
- Page 77 and 78: (weight/height) had the expected ne
- Page 79 and 80: Table 5. Anticipated health costs o
- Page 81 and 82: When no consideration is given to h
- Page 83 and 84: MAFF. 1991. Pesticides approved und
- Page 85 and 86: and analyzed. We used this data bas
- Page 87 and 88: soluble herbicide is distributed in
- Page 89 and 90: of the rice herbicides thiobencarb
- Page 91 and 92: germination because they compete fo
- Page 93 and 94: in N 2 fixation and nitrate reducti
- Page 95 and 96: Table 3. Effects of pesticides on n
- Page 97 and 98: transformations in soils are studie
- Page 99 and 100: Floodwater invertebrates Applicatio
- Page 101 and 102: tally prevented photosynthetic acti
- Page 103 and 104: CITED REFERENCES Almazan LL, Robles
- Page 105 and 106: Mandal BB, Bandyopadhyay P, Bandyop
- Page 107 and 108: Smith RJ, Flinchum WT, Seaman DE. 1
- Page 110 and 111: IMPACT OF HERBICIDE USE ON THE ENVI
- Page 112 and 113: Factors that reduce toxic risk Phys
- Page 114 and 115: Table 3. Persistence in soil of ric
- Page 116 and 117: One infamous herbicide spill occurr
- Page 118 and 119: investigated because of the large,
- Page 120 and 121: Given the current state of knowledg
- Page 124 and 125: EFFECT OF HERBICIDE USE ON AQUACULT
- Page 126 and 127: Use of agricultural chemicals in fi
- Page 128 and 129: Table 2. Effect of pentachloropheno
- Page 130 and 131: persist for several years. Phenolic
- Page 132 and 133: Table 5. Reduction of aquatic weeds
- Page 134: Jiang JF. 1992. Scale-optimal manag
- Page 137 and 138: the crop and the weed, crop density
- Page 139 and 140: and their relative times of emergen
- Page 141 and 142: CITED REFERENCES Aldrich RJ. 1984.
- Page 144 and 145: ECOLOGICAL FORCES INFLUENCING WEED
- Page 146 and 147: Table 2. Cumulative temperature req
- Page 148 and 149: 1988 1992 1,257,158 1,193,354 679,3
- Page 150 and 151: Crop rotation. Rotation of differen
- Page 152 and 153: demand for herbicide combinations c
- Page 154 and 155: • Through the selection of a natu
- Page 156 and 157: Preventing or managing herbicide re
- Page 158: Integrated weed management
- Page 161 and 162: Direct control methods involve cult
- Page 163 and 164: Table 1. Herbicides used for weed c
- Page 165 and 166: Table 3. New rice herbicides and he
- Page 167 and 168: The greatest constraints to widespr
- Page 169 and 170: Nitrogen fertilizer management In A
- Page 171 and 172: for drought tolerance (Pamplona et
- Page 173 and 174:
uried propagules to freezing temper
- Page 175 and 176:
able rainfall, with the resulting e
- Page 177 and 178:
Chiang MY. 1992. Integrated weed ma
- Page 179 and 180:
Pamplona RR, Dingkuhn M, Ampong-Nya
- Page 182 and 183:
INTRODUCING INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEM
- Page 184 and 185:
Table 1. Changes in weed flora with
- Page 186 and 187:
MADA’s extension program The foll
- Page 189 and 190:
1. To reduce grass weed infestation
- Page 191 and 192:
Surveys of information recall and i
- Page 193 and 194:
8. Herbicide use and rice yield in
- Page 195 and 196:
25% weed coverage of Echinochloa, w
- Page 198 and 199:
BlOHERBlClDES AND WEED MANAGEMENT I
- Page 200 and 201:
Many integrated pest management (IP
- Page 202 and 203:
success of Collego® against Aeschy
- Page 204 and 205:
ange need not be excluded as it may
- Page 206 and 207:
themselves; a good deal of the rese
- Page 208 and 209:
view, laboratory-produced inoculum
- Page 210 and 211:
etter chance for their acceptance (
- Page 212 and 213:
Dorschner KP. 1983. Regulatory, env
- Page 214 and 215:
Soerjani M. 1988. Current trends in
- Page 216 and 217:
GENETIC IMPROVEMENT OF RICE FOR WEE
- Page 218 and 219:
TOLERANCE FOR ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS
- Page 220 and 221:
The genes coded for herbicide resis
- Page 222:
Jennings PR, Herrera RM. 1968. Stud
- Page 225 and 226:
1. Biotechnology tools for use in s
- Page 227 and 228:
taining potentially useful alien ge
- Page 229 and 230:
farmers will be able to select safe
- Page 231 and 232:
Datta SK, Datta K, Soltanifar N, Do
- Page 234 and 235:
IDENTIFYING ALLELOPATHY IN RICE GER
- Page 236 and 237:
Test 2. The efficacy of 38 rice acc
- Page 238 and 239:
Table 1. Origin and characteristics
- Page 240 and 241:
Test 3. No significant differences
- Page 242 and 243:
Table 6. Reduction in weed root dry
- Page 244:
Schreiber MM, Williams JL Jr. 1967.
- Page 248 and 249:
ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL INFLUENC
- Page 250 and 251:
severe the weed infestation, the mo
- Page 252 and 253:
One of the main difficulties associ
- Page 254 and 255:
with herbicides will increase with
- Page 256:
Moody K. 1992. Weed management in w
- Page 259 and 260:
WEED MANAGEMENT IN IRRIGATED RICE C
- Page 261 and 262:
Table 2. Main herbicides registered
- Page 263 and 264:
Table 3. Main herbicides used in Ja
- Page 265 and 266:
CHANGES IN WEED COMMUNITIES The ser
- Page 267 and 268:
WEED MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Pre
- Page 269 and 270:
To prevent overapplication of chemi
- Page 271 and 272:
and research institutions might fol
- Page 273 and 274:
Development of resistance The evolu
- Page 275 and 276:
Cooperation The development of new
- Page 277 and 278:
equire regulations and restrictions
- Page 279 and 280:
CITED REFERENCES Altieri MA. 1994.
- Page 281 and 282:
Weitzman M. 1974. Prices vs. quanti
- Page 283 and 284:
Dr. Walter Falcon Institute for Int
- Page 285:
Dr. Pierre Roger Laboratoire ORSTOM