41 st EGAS CP 14 Gdańsk 2009 A theoretical study of the isotope shift on electron affinity of chlorine T. Carette ∗ , M.R. Godefroid SCQP, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium ∗ Corresponding author: tcarette@ulb.ac.be If the electron affinity (EA) is well known for most of the elements, it remains a challenging quantity to calculate. On the experimental side, the measurements of isotope shift (IS) on electron affinity are limited by both resolution and sensitivity. In this case, theory can eventually be of some help even though correlation plays a dominant role in negative ions structure and, particularly, in the calculation of specific mass shift (SMS). We report Multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock calculations on isotope shift in electron affinity of chlorine. The present study solves the longstanding theory-observation sign discrepancy between the calculated and measured specific mass shift contributions on electron affinity of chlorine for the isotopes 37 and 35 [1]. Table 1: Electron affinities and isotope shifts calculated and measured using our calculated field shift -0.003 (20) GHz. Model EA (eV) SMS 37/35 (GHz) IS 37/35 (GHz) Theory [1] +0.50 1.24 Theory (this work) 3.663 −0.495 0.253(20) + relativistic correction from [2] 3.611 Experiment [1] 3.613 0.22(14) References [1] U. Berzinsh, M. Gustafsson, D. Hanstorp, A. Klinkmüller, U. Ljungblad, A.M. Mårtensson Pendrill, Phys. Rev. A 51, 231 (1995) [2] G. de Oliveira, J.M.L. Martin, F. de Proft, P. Geerlings, Phys. Rev. A 60, 1034 (1999) 74
41 st EGAS CP 15 Gdańsk 2009 Nonresonant corrections for the optical resonance frequency measurements in hydrogen atom L. Labzowsky 1,2 , G. Schedrin 1 , D. Solovyev 1 , E. Chernovskaya 1,∗ , G. Plunien 3 , S. Karshenboim 4,5 1 V.A. Fock Institute of Physics, St. Petersburg State <strong>University</strong>, 198904, Uljanovskaya 1, Petrodvorets, St. Petersburg, Russia 2 Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, 188350, Gatchina, St. Petersburg, Russia 3 Institut für Theoretische Physik, Technische Universität Dresden, Mommsenstrasse 13, D-01062, Dresden, Germany 4 D.I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology, St. Petersburg, 190005, Russia 5 Max-Planck Institut für Quantenoptik, Garching, 85748, Germany ∗ Corresponding author: jkfizfak@rambler.ru The deviation of the natural spectral line profile from the Lorentz shape for the optical resonant frequency measurements is considered. This deviation leads to an asymmetry, which is mainly due to nonresonant correction to the resonant Lorentz profile. The nonresonant corrections are studied for the different types of the atomic resonant experiments [1,2]. The most accurate recent optical resonance experiments [3,4] are analyzed, i.e. the two-photon 1s–2s resonance excitation of the hydrogen atom with the delayed decay in the external electric field. The description of the nonresonant correction in the latter case requires the employment of QED with different in- and out-Hamiltonians. The nonresonant corrections for this experiment are investigated and found to be about 10 −5 Hz, while the recent experimental uncertainty is 34 Hz and in the near feature is expected to be few Hz. The projected 1s–2s resonance excitation experiment with the three-photon ionization detection (which is now in progress) is also considered. References [1] L.N. Labzowsky, D.A. Solovyev, G. Plunien, G. Soff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 143003 (2001); Can. J. Phys. 80, 1187 (2002); Phys. Rev. A 65, 05 02 (2002) [2] L. Labzowsky, G. Schedrin, D. Solovyev, G. Plunien, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 203003 (2007) [3] A. Huber, B. Gross, M. Weitz, T.W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. A 59 , 1844 (1999) M.Niering, R. Holzwarth, J. Reichert, P. Pokasov, Th. Udem, M.Weitz, T.W. Hänsch, P. Lemond, G. Semtarelli, M. Abgrall, P. Lourent, C. Salomon, A. Clairon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5496 (2000) [4] M. Fischer, N. Kolachevsky, M. Zimmermann, R. Holzwarth, Th. Udem, T.W. Hänsch, M. Abgrall, J. Grunert, I. Maksimovic, S. Bize, H. Marion, F. Pereira Dos Santos, P. Lemonde, G. Santarelli, P. Laurent, A. Clairon, C. Salomon, M. Haas, U.D. Jentschura, C.H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 230802 (2004) 75