Analysing spatial point patterns in R - CSIRO
Analysing spatial point patterns in R - CSIRO
Analysing spatial point patterns in R - CSIRO
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
88 Tests of Complete Spatial Randomness<br />
14 Tests of Complete Spatial Randomness<br />
The basic ‘reference’ or ‘benchmark’ model of a random <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong> pattern is the uniform Poisson<br />
<strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong> process <strong>in</strong> the plane with <strong>in</strong>tensity λ, sometimes called Complete Spatial Randomness<br />
(CSR). Its basic properties are<br />
the number of <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong>s fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> any region A has a Poisson distribution with mean λ ×<br />
area(A)<br />
given that there are n <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong>s <strong>in</strong>side region A, the locations of these <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong>s are i.i.d. and<br />
uniformly distributed <strong>in</strong>side A<br />
the contents of two disjo<strong>in</strong>t regions A and B are <strong>in</strong>dependent.<br />
For historical reasons, many researchers are focussed on establish<strong>in</strong>g that their data do not<br />
conform to this model. The logic is that, if a <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong> pattern is completely random, then there<br />
is noth<strong>in</strong>g “<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g” happen<strong>in</strong>g (because the <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong>s are completely unpredictable, and have<br />
no trend or association with anyth<strong>in</strong>g else). Statisticians would say that the uniform Poisson<br />
process often serves as the ‘null model’ <strong>in</strong> a statistical analysis.<br />
14.1 Def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />
The homogeneous Poisson process of <strong>in</strong>tensity λ > 0 has the properties<br />
(PP1): the number N(X ∩ B) of <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong>s fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> any region B is a Poisson random variable;<br />
(PP2): the expected number of <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong>s fall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> B is E[N(X ∩ B)] = λ · area(B);<br />
(PP3): if B 1 ,B 2 are disjo<strong>in</strong>t sets then N(X∩B 1 ) and N(X∩B 2 ) are <strong>in</strong>dependent random variables;<br />
(PP4): given that N(X ∩ B) = n, the n <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong>s are <strong>in</strong>dependent and uniformly distributed <strong>in</strong> B.<br />
The list is redundant; (PP2) and (PP3) are sufficient.<br />
This process is often called “Complete Spatial Randomness” (CSR) especially <strong>in</strong> biological<br />
science. Under CSR, <strong>po<strong>in</strong>t</strong>s are <strong>in</strong>dependent of each other and have the same propensity to be<br />
found at any location.<br />
It is easy to simulate the Poisson process directly by follow<strong>in</strong>g the properties (PP1)–(PP4).<br />
In spatstat, use the command rpoispp (by convention, random data generators have names<br />
beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with r).<br />
> plot(rpoispp(100))<br />
rpoispp(100)<br />
Copyright<strong>CSIRO</strong> 2010