05.03.2015 Views

Latvia

Latvia

Latvia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Health systems in transition<br />

<strong>Latvia</strong><br />

environmental hazards. In addition, the State Fire Inspectorate controls how<br />

institutions comply with requirements to prevent fire hazards.<br />

All health care organizations must be certified in order to qualify for<br />

contracts with the SCHIA for provision of health care services under the<br />

statutory system.<br />

There is a continuous process of development of mandatory requirements for<br />

health care organizations. New requirements for blood services were approved<br />

in 2005 in accordance with EC Directives regarding standards of quality and<br />

safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human<br />

blood and blood components. New mandatory requirements for health care<br />

institutions, including diagnostic facilities and medical laboratories are being<br />

developed.<br />

The Law on “Medical Treatment” (1997) also determines the process of<br />

voluntary certification (accreditation) by use of national and international<br />

quality system standards for assessment of health care institutions. The national<br />

standards are still a subject of discussion among government policy-makers,<br />

health care managers and health care professionals. At the time of writing, one<br />

hospital has certified its quality system in accordance with ISO 9001:2000.<br />

There is a general tendency to use more clinical practice guidelines, which<br />

are usually developed by different associations of health care professionals.<br />

Although some of these are produced on the basis of international guidelines,<br />

as a result of revisions and adaptations to the local context there are some<br />

doubts regarding their resulting quality. There is no formal responsibility for<br />

the development of guidelines; therefore there is no common methodology<br />

or formal mechanism for developing, approving and implementing quality<br />

assessment guidelines. Moreover, whereas there is increasing interest among<br />

health care managers and clinicians in the development of a system of health<br />

care quality assessment by use of appropriate outcome indicators, the majority<br />

of statistical data reflects productivity issues rather than problems related to<br />

quality of care.<br />

The body mainly responsible for overseeing quality of care issues is the<br />

Quality Control Inspectorate for Expert Examination in Health Care and<br />

Ability to Work, under the Ministry of Health. This agency has the right to<br />

apply appropriate penalties to health care providers, including those that<br />

operate without certification. In practice, very few non-certified institutions<br />

are penalized.<br />

There are ongoing discussions about establishing new standards for<br />

accreditation of health care organizations. There is general agreement that the<br />

standards should include most of the quality system elements, clinical processes<br />

measurement and also outcome measurement. The goal is to create a more<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!