11.03.2015 Views

Revelation 20 - In Depth Bible Commentaries

Revelation 20 - In Depth Bible Commentaries

Revelation 20 - In Depth Bible Commentaries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2259<br />

Compare John's language at <strong>Revelation</strong> 9:1, "...The key of the pit of the abyss was<br />

given [to a star having fallen out of heaven into the earth]." See the footnotes on that passage,<br />

and compare 1:18 and 3:7. There should be no question concerning the symbolical<br />

nature of this language. Are we to think that stars can hold keys, or that spiritual beings can<br />

be bound with literal chains, or that there is a literal pit somewhere on earth in which the evil<br />

dragon is locked up? Should we think in terms of a hidden entrance in the depths of Carlsbad<br />

Caverns, or at the bottom of Lake Ness? Such literalistic understanding of obviously symbolical<br />

material is, we think, both mistaken and misleading.<br />

Oftentimes the question is raised, “But how can we tell the difference between symbolical<br />

and literal? The answer is, by using our heads. We do it all the time in everyday speech.<br />

When someone complains that they have gotten a million phone-calls, we don’t think twice in<br />

refusing to take the statement literally, but understand it to mean that the person has had a<br />

very busy day. When the <strong>Bible</strong> says that God is our “Rock,” or that we can take shelter “under<br />

His wings,” we don’t start asking whether or not God is made out of granite or cement, or is a<br />

“Big Bird.” So it is in reading <strong>Revelation</strong>. We know that it is filled with “signs” and “symbols,”<br />

and that it is biblical “prophecy,” that is enigmatic in nature, filled with “riddles.” So, we don’t<br />

expect to take everything literally and at face-value. We don’t think of a literal dragon or snake<br />

(“rattle-snake”!) when thinking of satan. And we are careful not to try and get clarity where it is<br />

lacking, or attempt to construct time-tables on the basis of such statements, as do the interpreters<br />

who attempt to decide whether or not the so-called “second coming” is “pre-millennial” or<br />

“post-millennial.”<br />

2260<br />

On the "abyss," see <strong>Revelation</strong> 9:1 with its footnotes, and the preceding footnote.<br />

This word occurs at 9:1, 2; 11:7; 17:8; <strong>20</strong>:1 and 3. Elsewhere in the New Testament it<br />

occurs only at Luke 8:31 and Romans 10:7.<br />

<strong>In</strong> the Greek translation of the Hebrew <strong>Bible</strong>, this noun occurs at: Genesis 1:2 ("darkness<br />

was upon the abyss"); 7:11; 8:2; Deuteronomy 8:7 (where it means "deep springs of<br />

water"); 33:13 (similar to 8:7); Job 28:14; 36:16 (where it means something like "jaws of<br />

death"); 38:16 (where it is parallel with "gates of death"); 41: 22, 23, 23; Psalm 33:7; 36:6;<br />

42:7 ("deep calls to deep"); 71:<strong>20</strong> ("from the abysses of the earth you will bring me up"); 77:<br />

16; 78:15; 104:6; 106:9; 107:26; 135:6; 148:7; Proverbs 3:<strong>20</strong>; 8:24; Wisdom of Solomon<br />

10:19; Sirach 1:3; 16:18; 24:5, 29; 42:18; 43:23; Amos 7:4; Jonah 2:6; Habakkuk 3:10;<br />

Isaiah 44:27; 51:10; 63:13; Ezekiel 26:19; 31:4, and 15. It is used predominantly as a<br />

translation of the Hebrew word ~Ah+t., thehom ("deep," of the ocean depths), and for "deep<br />

springs" of water in the land of Israel. It is rarely used in terms of the hidden depths of the<br />

deep sea, as being a synonym for the place where people go when they die--but there is little<br />

of the Greek mythological connotations so easily attached to such a word, when we use it to<br />

mean "the bottomless pit." That John sees an abyss that has a "key" immediately confirms<br />

the symbolic nature of John's vision.<br />

2261<br />

This is the only place in <strong>Revelation</strong> where the word a[lusij, halusis, “chain" occurs.<br />

Again, the symbolical nature of this descriptive language is obvious. Even Walvoord, who ordinarily<br />

insists on a literal interpretation, has to ask how a spiritual being like "the Devil" can be<br />

(continued...)<br />

986

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!