Revelation 20 - In Depth Bible Commentaries
Revelation 20 - In Depth Bible Commentaries
Revelation 20 - In Depth Bible Commentaries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2363 2364 2365 2366<br />
underworld were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of<br />
2367 2368<br />
fire. <strong>20</strong>.15 And if anyone was not found having been written in the scroll of the life, that<br />
2363<br />
Compare Paul's statement in 1 Corinthians 15:26, "The last enemy to be destroyed<br />
is death." <strong>In</strong> verses 54-55 he states, "...Then the saying that is written will come true: 'Death<br />
has been swallowed up in victory.' 'Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your<br />
sting?'" Paul is quoting Isaiah 25:8 and Hosea 13:14.<br />
Aune comments that “The suggestion that death and hades...could share the fate of the<br />
enemies of God (19:<strong>20</strong>; <strong>20</strong>:10) seems problematic [again, we see no problem, since we expect<br />
such puzzling, enigmatic elements in biblical prophecy]. There are at least two ways of<br />
understanding ths significance of this statement: (1) It could simply be a way of referring to<br />
the [final] elimination of death (compare <strong>Revelation</strong> 21:4; 1 Corinthians 15:26). (2) More<br />
probably, however, ‘death and hades’ here stand for all the unrighteous dead in accord with<br />
verse 15, where it is stated that all whose names were not found in the book of life were cast<br />
into the lake of fire.” (P. 1103)<br />
2364<br />
Immediately before the demonstrative pronoun ïôïò, houtos, “this,” the conjunction<br />
kai, kai, “and,” is interpolated into the text by Sinaiticus. We have seen this copyist shortening<br />
the text on many occasions; here he lengthens the text. The interpolation does not change<br />
the meaning of <strong>Revelation</strong>.<br />
2365<br />
Aune comments that “Explanatory remarks made within the context of visions regularly<br />
make use of the present tense.” (P. 1076)<br />
2366<br />
The phrase èÜíáôïò äåýôåñüò, thanatos ho deuteros, literally “death, the second<br />
one,” is changed to read äåýôåñüò èÜíáôïò, “second death,” by Sinaiticus, Minuscule 1611<br />
(see), and a few other Greek manuscripts. This is simply another way of saying the same<br />
thing, but again, slightly reduces the number of words found in the text. It does not change the<br />
meaning of <strong>Revelation</strong>.<br />
2367<br />
The entire sentence, ïôïò èÜíáôïò äåýôåñüò óôéí, ëßìíç ôï ðõñüò, houtos<br />
ho thanatos ho deuteros estin, he limne tou puros, literally “This, the death, the second<br />
one, is–the lake of the fire,” is omitted by Uncial Manuscript 051, Minuscule <strong>20</strong>53 (the text),<br />
<strong>20</strong>62 (the text), the “Majority Text” (A), the Old Latin Manuscripts a, sin, the Bohairic Coptic,<br />
and Augustine (who died 430 A.D.). We think this is another example of the eye of the copyist<br />
skipping from the first occurrence of ðõñüò, puros to its second occurrence, and as a<br />
result, leaving out the intervening words.<br />
Aune comments that “This sentence is...problematic, for how can death and hades<br />
experience the second death when they have not experienced the first (i.e., physical) death?”<br />
(P. 1103; compare footnote 2363). Once again, we think that such a question can only be<br />
asked by those expecting clear, logically consistent statements in prophetic visions. There is<br />
(continued...)<br />
1045