Smoking and mental health - NCSCT
Smoking and mental health - NCSCT
Smoking and mental health - NCSCT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ethical <strong>and</strong> legal aspects 9<br />
patients <strong>and</strong> staff. The moral imperative of <strong>health</strong>care institutions to promote the<br />
<strong>mental</strong> <strong>and</strong> physical <strong>health</strong> of their patients (<strong>and</strong> to protect <strong>and</strong> support the<br />
<strong>mental</strong> <strong>and</strong> physical <strong>health</strong> of their staff) makes a shift in culture within <strong>mental</strong><br />
<strong>health</strong> institutions away from one that supports smoking. But supporting<br />
smoking cessation should take note of the general approach to each patient’s<br />
care. Coercion will rarely be justified. In the very specific circumstances of highsecurity<br />
facilities, security will necessarily take priority over patients’ wishes to go<br />
outside to smoke. But applying smoke-free policies in these circumstances is not<br />
forcing patients to give up smoking for the sake of giving up smoking. Rather it<br />
is applying the necessary security measures in a situation where protecting the<br />
<strong>health</strong> <strong>and</strong> wellbeing of others (in this case through application of a smoke-free<br />
policy designed to protect others) is a priority in any case.<br />
9.5 Summary<br />
> The entitlement of people with <strong>mental</strong> disorders to smoking cessation<br />
support is at least as strong as for those of the general population.<br />
> Their needs for such support are in many cases actually greater.<br />
Patients with <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> problems should receive at least the same level of<br />
access to smoking cessation treatment <strong>and</strong> aids to quitting as members of<br />
the general population.<br />
> The objectives of smoking cessation <strong>and</strong> tobacco control policies in the<br />
<strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong>care context need to take account of the complexity of the care<br />
needs of people with <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> problems.<br />
> The case law relating to smoking policies in formal <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong>care<br />
settings <strong>and</strong> prisons suggests that a careful balance needs to be struck<br />
between personal rights <strong>and</strong> welfare, the objectives of the institutions, <strong>and</strong><br />
the rights <strong>and</strong> interests of other staff <strong>and</strong> residents/inmates.<br />
> There is a need for greater investment in smoking cessation treatment in the<br />
<strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong>care context.<br />
> Smoke-free policies in <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong> institutions, as in other public places,<br />
are justified on the grounds of <strong>health</strong> <strong>and</strong> wellbeing of non-smoking<br />
patients <strong>and</strong> staff.<br />
> The moral imperative of <strong>health</strong>care institutions to promote the <strong>mental</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
physical <strong>health</strong> of their patients (<strong>and</strong> to protect <strong>and</strong> support the <strong>mental</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
physical <strong>health</strong> of their staff) justifies a shift in culture within <strong>mental</strong> <strong>health</strong><br />
institutions away from one that supports smoking.<br />
References<br />
1 McNally L, Oyefeso A, Annan J, et al. A survey of staff attitudes to smoking-related policy<br />
<strong>and</strong> intervention in psychiatric <strong>and</strong> general <strong>health</strong> care settings. Journal of Public Health<br />
2006;28:192–6.<br />
© Royal College of Physicians 2013 187