29.03.2015 Views

Untitled - Oxfam Blogs

Untitled - Oxfam Blogs

Untitled - Oxfam Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Impacts of Price Hikes<br />

on the Life and Livelihoods<br />

of the Urban Poor<br />

market, tofu, fish and spices from Đôn market and pork side/pork fat from Đông Biên market. As you<br />

can tell, we have to compete even without clients to keep the business alive. However, I am very<br />

concerned that if prices continue to rise then it’s likely that in six months time we will lose all the clients<br />

and we will become even poorer.”<br />

4.3.3 Impact on the sub-urban poor<br />

Sub-urban districts of the big cities are still considered “rural” in practical terms although their infrastructure<br />

facilities and livelihoods are becoming more urban. At the study site in An Hai commune, An Lao district,<br />

Hai Phong City, the residents are mainly farmers, craftsmen (making rattan and bamboo items), enterprise<br />

workers and labourers. The “double-edged price” effect is similar to rice producing areas in Dien Bien.<br />

However there are also differences.<br />

Farmers tend to “leave their land” and lease it out. The acreage they are entitled to is very small (several<br />

hundred square meters per head). Those who were born or arrived after the land reallocation exercise do<br />

not receive land). The income from farm work is low compared to local handicraft jobs or jobs elsewhere.<br />

The acreage of cash crops and winter paddy crop has also declined. Farmers left their land either because<br />

there is no longer sufficient labour available or because of weather-related risks and the increased prices of<br />

agricultural inputs.<br />

At the surveyed commune in Hai Phong, more than 20 percent of households rented out their land in order<br />

to maintain legal access to the land (the rent is barely enough to pay tax to the local government). Those<br />

who rent the land consider this as a way to make small savings and to produce “clean paddies” of their<br />

own. Both local government officers and farmers believe such a trend is likely to continue. It is also<br />

associated with attempts to “accumulate land” in order to improve economies of scale.<br />

Lease land or accumulate land?<br />

The main source of income for the people in Tiên Cm 1 hamlet, An Thái commune, An Lao district,<br />

Hai Phong is from making rattan/bamboo frames of fake objects for religious burning practices (the<br />

hamlet itself is recognized by the Hai Phong Municipal Government as a handicraft village) and from<br />

working in local enterprises. In recent years they have stopped growing vegetable crops. Twenty<br />

percent of the households no longer grow rice. They have leased the land out to other people in the<br />

same hamlet or neighboring hamlets and only charged 20-40 kgs of paddy per sào (360m 2 ) which is<br />

just enough to pay tax. According to discussions with people in the hamlet, people started leasing out<br />

their land as early as 2003-2004. As of 2007, about 15 percent of the households had done this. By<br />

2008 the rate has increased to 20 percent and is likely to reach 25 percent in 2009. Currently “many<br />

more are seeking people to lease their land to”.<br />

“Paddy farming is no longer profitable. The income from each sao is only 100,000 VND (exclusive of<br />

labour cost). It may still worth doing if each household has several mau of land. However land is<br />

allocated at the rate of one sao (384m 2 ) per head. Those who were born or moved into this hamlet<br />

after the land reallocation exercise do not get any land at all. When the Nam Trieu industrial cluster<br />

becomes operational soon the number of households quitting paddy farming will further increase”.<br />

Leaders of the An Thai commune noted there was also a land accumulation exercise in 2005. Before<br />

that each household had 5-8 different plots of land scattered around. After 2005 they had only 1-3<br />

plots. “Perhaps we have to it once again to develop the large scaled farms”.<br />

They also observed the trend of “leaving the land” elsewhere in the district. The cultivation rate is still<br />

100 percent. However this is done by those who rent the land from the original owners who do not<br />

have any labour available to do the farm work or who can not afford to do it because of weather-related<br />

risks and increased prices of agricultural inputs. Those who rent the land consider this as one of the<br />

ways to keep some small savings and to produce “clean paddies” of their own. The total acreage of<br />

winter paddy crop and cash crops (e.g. maize, soybean and sweet potato) of the district has fallen from<br />

2,000 ha (or a third of district’s 6,000 ha farm land) in 1993-1994 to only 300-400 ha in 2008.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!