Untitled - Oxfam Blogs
Untitled - Oxfam Blogs
Untitled - Oxfam Blogs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Impacts of Price Hikes<br />
on the Life and Livelihoods<br />
of the Urban Poor<br />
market, tofu, fish and spices from Đôn market and pork side/pork fat from Đông Biên market. As you<br />
can tell, we have to compete even without clients to keep the business alive. However, I am very<br />
concerned that if prices continue to rise then it’s likely that in six months time we will lose all the clients<br />
and we will become even poorer.”<br />
4.3.3 Impact on the sub-urban poor<br />
Sub-urban districts of the big cities are still considered “rural” in practical terms although their infrastructure<br />
facilities and livelihoods are becoming more urban. At the study site in An Hai commune, An Lao district,<br />
Hai Phong City, the residents are mainly farmers, craftsmen (making rattan and bamboo items), enterprise<br />
workers and labourers. The “double-edged price” effect is similar to rice producing areas in Dien Bien.<br />
However there are also differences.<br />
Farmers tend to “leave their land” and lease it out. The acreage they are entitled to is very small (several<br />
hundred square meters per head). Those who were born or arrived after the land reallocation exercise do<br />
not receive land). The income from farm work is low compared to local handicraft jobs or jobs elsewhere.<br />
The acreage of cash crops and winter paddy crop has also declined. Farmers left their land either because<br />
there is no longer sufficient labour available or because of weather-related risks and the increased prices of<br />
agricultural inputs.<br />
At the surveyed commune in Hai Phong, more than 20 percent of households rented out their land in order<br />
to maintain legal access to the land (the rent is barely enough to pay tax to the local government). Those<br />
who rent the land consider this as a way to make small savings and to produce “clean paddies” of their<br />
own. Both local government officers and farmers believe such a trend is likely to continue. It is also<br />
associated with attempts to “accumulate land” in order to improve economies of scale.<br />
Lease land or accumulate land?<br />
The main source of income for the people in Tiên Cm 1 hamlet, An Thái commune, An Lao district,<br />
Hai Phong is from making rattan/bamboo frames of fake objects for religious burning practices (the<br />
hamlet itself is recognized by the Hai Phong Municipal Government as a handicraft village) and from<br />
working in local enterprises. In recent years they have stopped growing vegetable crops. Twenty<br />
percent of the households no longer grow rice. They have leased the land out to other people in the<br />
same hamlet or neighboring hamlets and only charged 20-40 kgs of paddy per sào (360m 2 ) which is<br />
just enough to pay tax. According to discussions with people in the hamlet, people started leasing out<br />
their land as early as 2003-2004. As of 2007, about 15 percent of the households had done this. By<br />
2008 the rate has increased to 20 percent and is likely to reach 25 percent in 2009. Currently “many<br />
more are seeking people to lease their land to”.<br />
“Paddy farming is no longer profitable. The income from each sao is only 100,000 VND (exclusive of<br />
labour cost). It may still worth doing if each household has several mau of land. However land is<br />
allocated at the rate of one sao (384m 2 ) per head. Those who were born or moved into this hamlet<br />
after the land reallocation exercise do not get any land at all. When the Nam Trieu industrial cluster<br />
becomes operational soon the number of households quitting paddy farming will further increase”.<br />
Leaders of the An Thai commune noted there was also a land accumulation exercise in 2005. Before<br />
that each household had 5-8 different plots of land scattered around. After 2005 they had only 1-3<br />
plots. “Perhaps we have to it once again to develop the large scaled farms”.<br />
They also observed the trend of “leaving the land” elsewhere in the district. The cultivation rate is still<br />
100 percent. However this is done by those who rent the land from the original owners who do not<br />
have any labour available to do the farm work or who can not afford to do it because of weather-related<br />
risks and increased prices of agricultural inputs. Those who rent the land consider this as one of the<br />
ways to keep some small savings and to produce “clean paddies” of their own. The total acreage of<br />
winter paddy crop and cash crops (e.g. maize, soybean and sweet potato) of the district has fallen from<br />
2,000 ha (or a third of district’s 6,000 ha farm land) in 1993-1994 to only 300-400 ha in 2008.<br />
67