Untitled - Oxfam Blogs
Untitled - Oxfam Blogs
Untitled - Oxfam Blogs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Rising Prices,<br />
Poverty Reduction and<br />
Relevant Policies<br />
organize vocational training for the poor. In Hai Phong, for example, since 2007 DOLISA has an annual<br />
budget of 700-800 million VND to organize free vocational trainings for the poor. In additon, there is<br />
a budget of 1.5-2 billion VND for vocational training for farmers whose land has been recalled.<br />
In practice, the really poor people do not often participate in these trainings, nor borrow loans for<br />
training for their children. One of the main reasons is that they are busy making money to meet shortterm<br />
needs (“poor people are not able to plan ahead“) or they are afraid they will not find a job after<br />
training. For example, in Unit 25, ward 6, Go Vap district, no participants turned up for a free vocational<br />
training course.<br />
5.2.7 Agricultural extension<br />
At the rural study sites agricultural extension workers have recommended measures to help farmers reduce<br />
costs and improve productivity as prices increase such as the “3 reductions, 3 gains” initiative; increased<br />
use of bio-fertilizer, inorganic fertilizer and single ingredient fertlizers instead of blended fertilizers; improve<br />
product quality (through collecting, semi-processing and sorting).<br />
However, the effectiveness of agricultural extension work is limited. In many places poor people are still not<br />
keen on extension messages. The linkages between processing enterprises and the extension system<br />
remains loose. The agricultural extension programme needs to be strengthened and the grassroots<br />
extension network to be developed in order to meet the needs of different target groups and help the poor<br />
better cope with risks.<br />
Agricultural extension is not as easy in the context of rising prices<br />
In the last few years the Dien Bien district, Dien Bien province has been implementing the “3 reductions,<br />
3 gains” (reduce seed rate, reduce fertilizer rate and reduce pesticide spray; and gain productivity, gain<br />
quality and gain profit). However the effectiveness of the extension work has not been as desired. The<br />
“row seeding” technology using a row seed was introduced two years ago. However, it has only been<br />
applied to 100 ha (of the total 6,000 ha of paddy land of the district) as the farmers are not used to<br />
the “widely spaced holess“. The fertilizer rate has actually been increased rather than reduced. Nearly<br />
25 percent of the poor households and 35 percent of the non-poor households interviewed have<br />
increased their fertilizer rate over the last year and none have reduced the rate. The recommended<br />
frequency of pesticide spray is only two times per crop while many farmers still spray 3-4 times.<br />
In Huong Hoa district, Quang Tri province, the cassava processing plant has always recommended the<br />
use of fertilizers to improve soil quality. However, farmers still tend not to use fertilizers as they have not<br />
done so traditionally and assume it is a labour-intensive process. The plant is piloting a new fertilizer<br />
rate for cassava crop which costs less than the regularly recommended rate. However it is not easy to<br />
change the farming practice of the Vân Kiu group. Leaders of Xy commune believe that they “may<br />
have to wait until the next harvest when the people realize that output has further declined (there has<br />
been a 30 percent reduction of output of the last crop) and start paying attention to fertilizers“. There<br />
is also the disadvantage that the plant does not have a close relationship with the local extension system.<br />
5.2.8 Implementation of grassroots democracy<br />
There may be an opportunity to enhance the implementation of grassroots democracy. As prices increase<br />
people tend to become more sensitive to the various forms of mandatory contributions and require higher<br />
levels of transparency, waste reduction and quality assurance for infrastructure facilities. Grassroots cadres<br />
interviewed noted that “everything that requires contributions from the people has to be implemented<br />
thoroughly and supervised closely”. Transparent information will also allow for the smoother<br />
implementation of State managed activities, particularly “socialized” activities at the grassroots level. The<br />
experience of Go Vap district in implementing the “ward/commune budget analysis“ programme serves as<br />
a good example.<br />
77