29.03.2015 Views

Untitled - Oxfam Blogs

Untitled - Oxfam Blogs

Untitled - Oxfam Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Rising Prices,<br />

Poverty Reduction and<br />

Relevant Policies<br />

organize vocational training for the poor. In Hai Phong, for example, since 2007 DOLISA has an annual<br />

budget of 700-800 million VND to organize free vocational trainings for the poor. In additon, there is<br />

a budget of 1.5-2 billion VND for vocational training for farmers whose land has been recalled.<br />

In practice, the really poor people do not often participate in these trainings, nor borrow loans for<br />

training for their children. One of the main reasons is that they are busy making money to meet shortterm<br />

needs (“poor people are not able to plan ahead“) or they are afraid they will not find a job after<br />

training. For example, in Unit 25, ward 6, Go Vap district, no participants turned up for a free vocational<br />

training course.<br />

5.2.7 Agricultural extension<br />

At the rural study sites agricultural extension workers have recommended measures to help farmers reduce<br />

costs and improve productivity as prices increase such as the “3 reductions, 3 gains” initiative; increased<br />

use of bio-fertilizer, inorganic fertilizer and single ingredient fertlizers instead of blended fertilizers; improve<br />

product quality (through collecting, semi-processing and sorting).<br />

However, the effectiveness of agricultural extension work is limited. In many places poor people are still not<br />

keen on extension messages. The linkages between processing enterprises and the extension system<br />

remains loose. The agricultural extension programme needs to be strengthened and the grassroots<br />

extension network to be developed in order to meet the needs of different target groups and help the poor<br />

better cope with risks.<br />

Agricultural extension is not as easy in the context of rising prices<br />

In the last few years the Dien Bien district, Dien Bien province has been implementing the “3 reductions,<br />

3 gains” (reduce seed rate, reduce fertilizer rate and reduce pesticide spray; and gain productivity, gain<br />

quality and gain profit). However the effectiveness of the extension work has not been as desired. The<br />

“row seeding” technology using a row seed was introduced two years ago. However, it has only been<br />

applied to 100 ha (of the total 6,000 ha of paddy land of the district) as the farmers are not used to<br />

the “widely spaced holess“. The fertilizer rate has actually been increased rather than reduced. Nearly<br />

25 percent of the poor households and 35 percent of the non-poor households interviewed have<br />

increased their fertilizer rate over the last year and none have reduced the rate. The recommended<br />

frequency of pesticide spray is only two times per crop while many farmers still spray 3-4 times.<br />

In Huong Hoa district, Quang Tri province, the cassava processing plant has always recommended the<br />

use of fertilizers to improve soil quality. However, farmers still tend not to use fertilizers as they have not<br />

done so traditionally and assume it is a labour-intensive process. The plant is piloting a new fertilizer<br />

rate for cassava crop which costs less than the regularly recommended rate. However it is not easy to<br />

change the farming practice of the Vân Kiu group. Leaders of Xy commune believe that they “may<br />

have to wait until the next harvest when the people realize that output has further declined (there has<br />

been a 30 percent reduction of output of the last crop) and start paying attention to fertilizers“. There<br />

is also the disadvantage that the plant does not have a close relationship with the local extension system.<br />

5.2.8 Implementation of grassroots democracy<br />

There may be an opportunity to enhance the implementation of grassroots democracy. As prices increase<br />

people tend to become more sensitive to the various forms of mandatory contributions and require higher<br />

levels of transparency, waste reduction and quality assurance for infrastructure facilities. Grassroots cadres<br />

interviewed noted that “everything that requires contributions from the people has to be implemented<br />

thoroughly and supervised closely”. Transparent information will also allow for the smoother<br />

implementation of State managed activities, particularly “socialized” activities at the grassroots level. The<br />

experience of Go Vap district in implementing the “ward/commune budget analysis“ programme serves as<br />

a good example.<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!