15.11.2012 Views

Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin - Federation of American ...

Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin - Federation of American ...

Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin - Federation of American ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

derstand what they do, and after an eight month<br />

deployment with a Tactical PSYOP Company I can<br />

tell you this is mostly true. Like any major military<br />

change it takes time, especially for veteran Soldiers,<br />

to relook the way they see the fight. This transformation<br />

has made significant progress over the last<br />

five years as reflected in current stability, counterinsurgency<br />

and operational field manuals, but there<br />

is still much work to be done. The PSYOP and intelligence<br />

community must embark upon integration<br />

training that focuses on change, with a mutual respect<br />

for what each branch brings to the table. The<br />

success <strong>of</strong> PSYOP depends in part on its ability to<br />

integrate with the intelligence community and this<br />

integration depends primarily on good leaders who<br />

recognize the necessity and are diplomatic enough<br />

to integrate and move forward.<br />

Educating the Support<br />

<strong>Intelligence</strong> analysts at the lowest level <strong>of</strong> PSYOP<br />

units are a legitimate and necessary asset. PSYOP<br />

specialists are effects-based and really no different<br />

than maneuver in terms <strong>of</strong> their support needs.<br />

They do not have the time to read every situation report,<br />

track trends, gather imagery and conduct pattern<br />

analysis. At the very least, intelligence analysts<br />

free up PSYOP specialists to plan and operate. For<br />

far too long PSYOP specialists have been forced to do<br />

their own intelligence analyses in addition to the already<br />

demanding target audience analyses. There is<br />

much value added in cross training Soldiers but MI<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals will not get better at analysis by conducting<br />

operations and operators will not get better<br />

at executing by doing analysis. <strong>Intelligence</strong> support<br />

to PSYOP is unique but it is still by definition a support<br />

element and for the sake <strong>of</strong> providing world<br />

class PSYOP should be trained on all facets <strong>of</strong> IO.<br />

The disconnect here is <strong>of</strong>ten in defining needs<br />

and requirements from top down. For example,<br />

when TPTs need special equipment they request it<br />

through their headquarters element, which in turn<br />

tasks supply. It is not up to the supply sergeant to<br />

anticipate a special need any more than it is up to an<br />

intelligence analyst to tell the commander what information<br />

needs his operators will have. Doctrinally<br />

speaking, intelligence drives maneuver and the commander<br />

drives intelligence. This type <strong>of</strong> guidance is<br />

traditionally generated through priority intelligence<br />

requirements and information requirements but it<br />

can be done in any capacity that defines and artic-<br />

ulates the commander’s objectives. Analysts need<br />

to be given areas <strong>of</strong> focus, especially when dealing<br />

with a theater <strong>of</strong> operation as complex as Iraq or<br />

Afghanistan. The real danger in not giving adequate<br />

guidance regarding information needs is unnecessarily<br />

risking lives <strong>of</strong> Soldiers in TPTs to disseminate<br />

ineffective or even inaccurate products.<br />

A Product Development Detachment packages products for a<br />

leaflet drop.<br />

The Code<br />

Essentially intelligence support to PSYOP provides<br />

the tools, in the form <strong>of</strong> information, necessary to understand<br />

and eventually influence behavior. Cracking<br />

the code on intelligence support to PSYOP cannot be<br />

done in one rotation but that is not to discredit the<br />

aggressive efforts that are underway to integrate, educate<br />

and ultimately improve the support. A crucial<br />

part <strong>of</strong> this solution is getting intelligence analysts integrated<br />

with the PSYOP process and the evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

this is the 4 th PSYOP Group’s ability to provide trained<br />

analysts with a broad, and when necessary, in-depth<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> IO in terms <strong>of</strong> function, capability<br />

and application. The more each branch understands<br />

the intricate details <strong>of</strong> the other, the more likely they<br />

are to maintain successful longevity in meeting worldwide<br />

missions. Long term success for both elements<br />

is interdependent–support to PSYOP is not a success<br />

until PSYOP leaders wouldn’t conceive <strong>of</strong> going to the<br />

planning table without all resources available to them,<br />

and this includes intelligence assets.<br />

First Lieutenant Katie Winwood currently serves as the 9 th<br />

PSYOP Battalion (A) S2. She deployed with D/9 th PSYOP<br />

Battalion as the Company <strong>Intelligence</strong> Officer attached to<br />

the 5 th Special Forces Group in support <strong>of</strong> CJSOTF-AP, OIF<br />

IV. Lieutenant Winwood graduated from Liberty University<br />

with a BA in Government and was commissioned out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Virginia in 2006.<br />

April - June 2009 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!