omc: no mention; hence safe - BMA Capital Management
omc: no mention; hence safe - BMA Capital Management
omc: no mention; hence safe - BMA Capital Management
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
E&P<br />
MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Hamad Aslam<br />
Head of Research<br />
17<br />
E&P: VALUATIONS WITH CONVICTION<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
With the E&P sector being governed under Petroleum Policies, the federal<br />
budget <strong>no</strong>rmally has limited implications on the sector. However through its<br />
an<strong>no</strong>uncement on allowance of decommissioning cost as a tax deductible<br />
expense, the budget has resolved a long pending tax issue between FBR and<br />
E&P companies.<br />
Decommissioning cost: Deduction allowed over a period of ten<br />
years but one-off expense to be incurred by E&P companies<br />
It was an<strong>no</strong>unced that ‘Decommission Cost’ incurred by E&P companies shall<br />
be allowed as a tax deductible expense to be depleted over a period of ten<br />
years or the life of the development and production lease, whichever is less.<br />
Based on our preliminary understanding, the E&P companies currently<br />
expense out the afore<strong>mention</strong>ed cost at the time of actual decommissioning of<br />
respective wells. However FBR had up till <strong>no</strong>w <strong>no</strong>t allowed the expense to be<br />
tax deductible, as a result of which a total amount of PKR6bn is estimated to be<br />
pending against the sector. Based on latest financial reports, Pakistan<br />
Petroleum (PPL) and Pakistan Oilfield (POL) have respective amounts of<br />
PKR578mn and PKR447mn pending against this head.<br />
For OGDC, recall that the company booked an additional tax amount of<br />
PKR11.6bn in FY08 (and ~PKR3bn in FY09), thereby clearing off its pending<br />
dues against the tax liability.<br />
One-off expense to be booked by E&P companies<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
However, the above amount will <strong>no</strong>w be reversed over the remaining life (or the<br />
remaining of ten years, whichever is less). Moreover, <strong>no</strong>w that the expense has<br />
been allowed to be depleted over ten years, the company will earn the inherent<br />
benefit of time value by front loading the expense. As a result, we expect a<br />
marginal improvement in the bottomline of the E&P companies from FY11<br />
onwards.<br />
Circular debt largely ig<strong>no</strong>red in the budget: Attrition in cash<br />
reserves to continue<br />
To our disappointment, <strong>no</strong> concrete measures were an<strong>no</strong>unced with regards to<br />
resolving the energy chain circular debt; which for E&P companies (particularly<br />
OGDC and PPL) may mean continued attrition in cash reserves, low dividend<br />
payouts and inability to meet desired exploration efforts. (Refer to the section on<br />
Power Sector for details on the current situation on circular debt).<br />
Market weight maintained on the sector<br />
Amount (PKR'mn) EPS (PKR)<br />
POL 578 2.4<br />
PPL 447 0.5<br />
OGDC - -<br />
We maintain MARKETWEIGHT stance on the E&P sector as it continues to<br />
offer cash rich balance sheets, low leverage, good quality of earnings, stable<br />
cash flows and high conviction on earnings. Moreover, with the revenue stream<br />
de<strong>no</strong>minated in USD, the sector offers a hedge against devaluation in Pak<br />
Rupee.