13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Algebraic approach <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> II 481<br />

In other words, the spatial momentum is bounded above by the Planck momentum<br />

scale (if λ is the Planck time). Indeed, this is immediate from (24.24). Such singularities<br />

expressed in accumulation regions are a main discovery of the noncompact<br />

bicrossproduct theory visible already in the original examples [13]. They are a<br />

direct consequence of the nonlinearity but we also see their origin in the fact that<br />

the true group fac<strong>to</strong>risation has a ‘curled up’ compact direction. Moreover, this<br />

much-noted feature of the model is only a small part of the s<strong>to</strong>ry. We see that the<br />

fuller s<strong>to</strong>ry is that any point outside this region is boosted <strong>to</strong> infinite negative p 0<br />

by a finite boost with a similar s<strong>to</strong>ry for θ and finite momentum as we saw in Figure<br />

24.3. Indeed the actions ⊲, ⊳ breakdown at such points as the fac<strong>to</strong>risation itself<br />

breaks down. Note also that the group inversion which is the natural reversal under<br />

CPT symmetry takes us from the ‘best’ region A <strong>to</strong> the ‘worst’ region D, which is a<br />

fundamental time-asymmetry or non-reversability of the bicrossproduct model.<br />

24.3.2 Bicrossproduct U λ (poinc 1,1 ) quantum group<br />

Now, consider θ infinitesimal, i.e. we differentiate all expressions (24.20)–(24.21)<br />

by ∂<br />

∂θ | 0 which is all we need for the algebraic part of the bicrossproduct Hopf algebra<br />

(the full opera<strong>to</strong>r algebra structure needs the full global data). Thus denoting N<br />

the Lie algebra genera<strong>to</strong>r conjugate <strong>to</strong> θ, we have from the above the vec<strong>to</strong>r field<br />

and actions:<br />

)<br />

(1<br />

α ıN = ∂<br />

∂θ | 0 = p 1 ∂<br />

∂p + 1 − e −2λp0<br />

− λ(p 1 ) 2 ∂<br />

0 2 λ<br />

∂p 1<br />

p 0 ⊳N =−ı ∂p0′<br />

∂θ | 0 =−ıp 1 , p 1 ⊳N =−ı ∂p1′<br />

∂θ | 0 =− ı − e−2λp0<br />

(1 − λ(p 1 ) 2 )<br />

2 λ<br />

where the action ⊳ flips <strong>to</strong> the other way because θ is really a coordinate function<br />

on SO 1,1 now being evaluated against N. A right-handed cross product by this<br />

action gives the relations<br />

)<br />

(1<br />

[p 0 , N] =−ıp 1 , [p 1 , N] =− ı − e −2λp0<br />

− λ(p 1 ) 2 .<br />

2 λ<br />

Similarly differentiating the action (24.22) on θ at θ = 0 gives the action of<br />

an element of R>⊳R on N, which we view equivalently as a coaction L of the<br />

coordinate algebra in algebraic terms, <strong>to</strong> find,<br />

(p 0 , p 1 )⊲N = e −λp0 N ⇒ L (N) = e −λp0 ⊗ N<br />

which yields the coproduct and resulting antipode<br />

N = N ⊗ 1 + e −λp0 ⊗ N,<br />

SN =−e λp0 N

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!