13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120 R. Percacci<br />

where the heat kernel coefficients B 2n () are linear combinations of the O (n)<br />

i<br />

,<br />

Q n ( f ) = (−1) n f (n) (0) for n ≤ 0andQ n ( f ) are given by Mellin transforms<br />

of f for n > 0. 3 In this way one can write out explicitly the r.h.s. of (8.17) in terms<br />

of the O (n)<br />

i<br />

and read off the beta functions.<br />

When N → ∞, this is the dominant contribution <strong>to</strong> the gravitational beta functions,<br />

and gravi<strong>to</strong>n loops can be neglected [43; 40; 34]. The functions a (n)<br />

i<br />

defined<br />

in (8.5) become numbers; with the so-called optimized cu<strong>to</strong>ff function R k (z) =<br />

(k 2 − z)θ(k 2 − z),discussedin[25; 26], they are<br />

while a (n)<br />

i<br />

a (0) = n S − 4n D + 2n M<br />

32π 2 , a (1) = n S + 2n D − 4n M<br />

96π 2 ,<br />

a (2)<br />

1<br />

= 6n S + 36n D + 72n M<br />

11520π 2 , a (2)<br />

2<br />

= 10n S<br />

11520π 2 ,<br />

= 0forn ≥ 3. The beta functions (8.5) are then<br />

For n ̸= 2thisleads<strong>to</strong>anFP<br />

in particular we get<br />

∂ t ˜g (n)<br />

i<br />

= (2n − 4) ˜g (n)<br />

i<br />

˜g (n)<br />

i∗ = a(n) i<br />

˜ ∗ =− 3 4<br />

n S − 4n D + 2n M<br />

n S + 2n D − 4n M<br />

, ˜G ∗ =<br />

+ a (n)<br />

i<br />

. (8.19)<br />

4 − 2n , (8.20)<br />

12π<br />

−n S − 2n D + 4n M<br />

. (8.21)<br />

For n = 2, one gets instead g (2)<br />

i<br />

(k) = g (2)<br />

i<br />

(k 0 ) + a (2)<br />

i<br />

ln(k/k 0 ), implying asymp<strong>to</strong>tic<br />

freedom for the couplings λ and ξ of (8.11). Remarkably, with this cu<strong>to</strong>ff all<br />

the higher terms are zero at the FP. The critical exponents are equal <strong>to</strong> the canonical<br />

dimensions of the g (n) s, so and G are UV-relevant (attractive), λ and ξ are<br />

marginal and all the higher terms are UV-irrelevant. Note that in perturbation theory<br />

G would be UV-irrelevant (nonrenormalizable). At the nontrivial FP the quantum<br />

corrections conspire with the classical dimensions of and G <strong>to</strong> reconstruct the<br />

dimensions of g (0) and g (1) . This does not happen at the Gaussian FP, where the<br />

transformation between ˜G and ˜g (1) is singular.<br />

Using the same techniques, the one loop beta functions for gravity with the<br />

action (8.11) have been calculated by Codello & Percacci [11]. The beta functions<br />

for λ and ξ agree with those derived in the earlier literature on higher derivative<br />

gravity [16; 2; 12]. These couplings tend logarithmically <strong>to</strong> zero with a fixed ratio<br />

ω = −3λ/ξ → ω ∗ = −0.023. The beta functions of ˜ and ˜G differ from the<br />

ones that were given in the earlier literature essentially by the first two terms of<br />

3 This technique is used also in some noncommutative geometry models, see [9].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!