13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> phenomenology 429<br />

Tasks one and two really are prepara<strong>to</strong>ry work. The “fun” begins immediately<br />

after these first two tasks, when the relevant data are actually collected, possible<br />

departures from conventional theories are looked for, and the theories that could be<br />

falsified by those data are falsified.<br />

22.1.2 Task one accomplished: some effects introduced genuinely<br />

at the Planck scale could be seen<br />

Over the past few years several authors have shown in different ways and for different<br />

candidate Planck-scale effects that, in spite of the horrifying smallness of<br />

these effects, some classes of doable experiments and observations could see the<br />

effects. Just <strong>to</strong> make absolutely clear the fact that effects genuinely introduced at<br />

the Planck scale could be seen, let me exhibit one very clear illustrative example.<br />

The Planck-scale effect I consider here is codified by the following energymomentum<br />

(dispersion) relation<br />

( )<br />

m 2 ≃ E 2 −⃗p 2 + η ⃗p 2 E 2<br />

, (22.1)<br />

where E p denotes again the Planck scale and η is a phenomenological parameter.<br />

This is a good choice because convincing the reader that I am dealing with an effect<br />

introduced genuinely at the Planck scale is in this case effortless. It is in fact well<br />

known (see, e.g., Ref. [4]) that this type of Ep<br />

−2 correction <strong>to</strong> the dispersion relation<br />

can result from discretization of spacetime on a lattice with Ep −1 lattice spacing. 2<br />

If such a modified dispersion relation is part of a framework where the laws of<br />

energy-momentum conservation are unchanged one easily finds [5; 6; 7; 8] significant<br />

implications for the cosmic-ray spectrum. In fact, the “GZK cu<strong>to</strong>ff”, a key<br />

expected feature of the cosmic-ray spectrum, is essentially given by the threshold<br />

energy for cosmic-ray pro<strong>to</strong>ns <strong>to</strong> produce pions in collisions with CMBR pho<strong>to</strong>ns.<br />

In the evaluation of the threshold energy for p+γ CMBR → p+π the correction term<br />

η ⃗p 2 E 2 /Ep 2 of (22.1) can be very significant. Whereas the classical-spacetime prediction<br />

for the GZK cu<strong>to</strong>ff is around 5.10 19 eV, at those energies the Planck-scale<br />

E 2 p<br />

2 The idea of a rigid lattice description of spacetime is not really one of the most advanced for <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong><br />

research, but this consideration is irrelevant for task one: in order <strong>to</strong> get this phenomenology started we first<br />

must establish that the sensitivities we have are sufficient for effects as small as typically obtained from introducing<br />

structure at the Planck scale. The smallness of the effect in (22.1) is clearly representative of the type<br />

of magnitude that <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> effects are expected <strong>to</strong> have, and the fact that it can also be obtained from<br />

a lattice with Ep<br />

−1 spacing confirms this point. It is at a later stage of the development of this phenomenology,<br />

much beyond task one, that we should become concerned with testing “plausible <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> models”<br />

(whatever that means). Still it is noteworthy that, as discussed in some detail in Section 22.3, some modern<br />

<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>-research ideas, such as the one of spacetime noncommutativity, appear <strong>to</strong> give rise <strong>to</strong> the<br />

same type of effect, and actually in some cases one is led <strong>to</strong> considering effects similar <strong>to</strong> (22.1) but with a<br />

weaker (and therefore more testable) Planck-scale correction, going like E −1 p<br />

rather than E −2 p .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!