13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 E. Livine<br />

projec<strong>to</strong>r at the end vertices of every link which allows us <strong>to</strong> glue the Lorentz<br />

holonomies <strong>to</strong> the SU(2) intertwiners. The resulting functional is:<br />

φ (I e, j e ,i v ) (U e ,χ v ) = ∏ [ ]<br />

⊗<br />

i v |I e χ v j e (v) m e 〉<br />

(14.24)<br />

v e←↪v<br />

∏<br />

〈I e χ s(e) j e<br />

(s(e)) m e |D I e<br />

(U e )|I e χ t(e) j e (t(e)) m e 〉,<br />

e<br />

with an implicit sum over the ms. |Ixjm〉 is the standard basis of V j<br />

(x) ↩→ RI with<br />

m running from − j <strong>to</strong> j. In short, compared <strong>to</strong> the usual spin networks, we trace<br />

over the subspaces V j<br />

(χ) instead of the full spaces RI .<br />

Using these projected spin networks allows us <strong>to</strong> project the Lorentz structures<br />

on specific fixed SU(2) representations. This allows us <strong>to</strong> diagonalize the area opera<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

Considering a surface S intersecting the graph Ɣ only on one edge e at the<br />

level of a (possibly bivalent) vertex, its area opera<strong>to</strong>r Area S will be diagonalized<br />

by the projected spin network basis with the eigenvalues given above:<br />

√<br />

Area S |φ (I e, j e ,i v )<br />

Ɣ 〉=l 2 P j e ( j e + 1) − n 2 e + ρ2 e + 1 |φ(I e, j e ,i v )<br />

Ɣ 〉.<br />

The procedure is now simple. Given a graph Ɣ and a set of surfaces, in order <strong>to</strong><br />

have a spin network state diagonalizing the area opera<strong>to</strong>rs associated <strong>to</strong> all these<br />

surfaces, we simply need <strong>to</strong> project that spin network state at all the intersections<br />

of the surfaces with Ɣ. If we want <strong>to</strong> obtain quantum geometry states diagonalizing<br />

the areas of all the surfaces in the hypersurface , we would need <strong>to</strong> consider a<br />

“infinite refinement limit” where we project the spin network state at all points of its<br />

graph Ɣ. Such a procedure is described in more details in [13; 14]. However, from<br />

the point of view that space-time is fundamentally discrete at microscopic scales, it<br />

sounds reasonable <strong>to</strong> be satisfied with quantum geometry states that diagonalize the<br />

areas of a discrete number of surfaces (intersecting the graph at the points where<br />

we have projected the spin network states). This is consistent with the picture that<br />

considering a projected spin network state, the embedding of the hypersurface <br />

in<strong>to</strong> the space-time is only well-defined at the vertices of the graph, where we know<br />

the time normal χ: at all other points, remains fuzzy and so must be the surfaces<br />

embedded in .<br />

14.3.3 Simple spin networks<br />

Up <strong>to</strong> now, we have described quantum states f (A) and the action of triad-based<br />

opera<strong>to</strong>rs on them. We should also define the action of connection-based opera<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

We normally expect that A would act by simple multiplication of a wave function<br />

f (A). Unfortunately, in our framework, A does not commute with itself, so this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!