13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

202 T. Banks<br />

of the dS–Schwarzschild metric with the P 0 eigenvalue. Of course, extant quantum<br />

field theory calculations which demonstrate that we have a thermal ensemble of<br />

ordinary energies in de Sitter space, refer only <strong>to</strong> energies much smaller than the<br />

maximal black hole mass. We are led <strong>to</strong> conjecture the above relation between the<br />

entropy deficit (relative <strong>to</strong> the vacuum) of a p 0 eigenspace, and the eigenvalue, only<br />

<strong>to</strong> leading order in the ratio of the black hole mass <strong>to</strong> the Nariai mass. Remarkably,<br />

this prediction is valid [26]!<br />

It is easy <strong>to</strong> construct a Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian out of the fermionic pixel opera<strong>to</strong>rs introduced<br />

above, which reproduces the spectrum of black holes in dS space. One works<br />

in the approximation where the vacuum eigenstates are all exactly degenerate, so<br />

that black holes are stable. The vacuum density matrix is just the unit matrix.<br />

Black hole states are simply states in which we break the fermionic matrix ψi<br />

A<br />

in<strong>to</strong> four blocks, and insist that ψm D |BH〉=0, for matrix elements in the lower<br />

off diagonal block. A clumsy but explicit formula for the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian P 0 can be<br />

constructed [26].<br />

Some insight in<strong>to</strong> the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian P 0 is gained by remembering that global<br />

symmetry genera<strong>to</strong>rs in General Relativity are defined on space-like or null boundaries.<br />

The way in which dS space converges <strong>to</strong> Minkowski space is that the causal<br />

diamond of a single observer approaches the full Minkowski geometry. The future<br />

and past cosmological horizons of the observer converge <strong>to</strong> future and past infinity<br />

in asymp<strong>to</strong>tically flat space. Our basic proposal for the definition of observables in<br />

de Sitter space [27] is that there is an approximate S-matrix, S R which, as R →∞,<br />

approaches the S-matrix of asymp<strong>to</strong>tically flat space. S R refers only <strong>to</strong> localizable<br />

processes in a single horizon volume. As in any such limiting situation, we may<br />

expect that S R is not unique, and it is important <strong>to</strong> understand what aspects of it<br />

are universal for large R. We will argue later that for scattering processes whose<br />

center of mass energy is fixed as R →∞, the non-universal features may fall off<br />

like e −(RM P ) 3/2 .<br />

The geometry of the future cosmological horizon is the v → 0 limit of:<br />

ds 2 = R 2 (−dudv + d 2 ),<br />

and the static Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian is associated with the Killing vec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

(u∂ u − v∂ v ).<br />

Here, d 2 is the round metric on the 2-sphere. By contrast, future infinity in<br />

asymp<strong>to</strong>tically flat space, is the v → 0 limit of<br />

ds 2 =<br />

−dudv + d2<br />

v 2 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!