13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

316 D. Oriti<br />

diagrams correspond <strong>to</strong> manifolds is identified and discussed at length in [17]. All<br />

the relevant conditions can be checked algorithmically on any given Feynman diagram.<br />

It is not clear, at present, whether one can construct suitably constrained GFT<br />

models satisfying these conditions, thus generating only manifold-like complexes<br />

in their Feynman expansion.<br />

Each strand carries a field variable, i.e. a group element in configuration space<br />

or a representation label in momentum space. Therefore in momentum space each<br />

Feynman diagram is given by a spin foam (a 2-complex with faces labeled by<br />

representation variables), and each Feynman amplitude (a complex function of the<br />

representation labels, obtained by contracting vertex amplitudes with propaga<strong>to</strong>r<br />

functions) by a spin foam model (see chapter 15 by Perez):<br />

Z(Ɣ) = ∑ ∏<br />

A(J f ) ∏ A e (J f |e ) ∏ A v (J f |v ).<br />

J f f<br />

e<br />

v<br />

As in all spin foam models, the representation variables have a geometric<br />

interpretation (edge lengths, areas, etc.) (see [9; 10]) and so each of these<br />

Feynman amplitudes corresponds <strong>to</strong> a definition of a sum-over-his<strong>to</strong>ries for discrete<br />

<strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> on the specific triangulation dual <strong>to</strong> the Feynman diagram,<br />

although the quantum amplitudes for each geometric configuration are not necessarily<br />

given by the exponential of a discrete gravity action. For more on the<br />

quantum geometry behind spin foam models we refer <strong>to</strong> the literature [9; 10; 28].<br />

One can show that the inverse is also true: any local spin foam model can be<br />

obtained from a GFT perturbative expansion [13; 2]. This implies that the GFT<br />

approach subsumes the spin foam approach at the perturbative level, while at the<br />

same time going beyond it, since there is of course much more in a QFT than<br />

its perturbative expansion. The sum over Feynman diagrams gives then a sum<br />

over spin foams (his<strong>to</strong>ries of the spin networks on the boundary in any scattering<br />

process), and equivalently a sum over triangulations, augmented by a sum over<br />

algebraic data (group elements or representations) with a geometric interpretation,<br />

assigned <strong>to</strong> each triangulation. Expectation values of GFT observables can also be<br />

evaluated perturbatively. These are given [2] by gauge invariant combinations of<br />

the basic field opera<strong>to</strong>rs that can be constructed in momentum space using spin<br />

networks according <strong>to</strong> the formula<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

O =(γ, je ,i v )(φ) = ⎝ ∏ ∫<br />

dg ij dg ji<br />

⎠ (γ, je ,i v )(g ij g −1<br />

ji<br />

) ∏ φ(g ij ),<br />

(ij)<br />

i<br />

where (γ, je ,i v )(g) identifies a spin network functional for the spin network labeled<br />

by a graph γ with representations j e associated <strong>to</strong> its edges and intertwiners i v associated<br />

<strong>to</strong> its vertices, and g ij are group elements associated <strong>to</strong> the edges (ij) of γ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!