13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52 J. Stachel<br />

connection (see, e.g. [29]): the chrono-geometry is represented by means of the cobasis<br />

of 1-forms: g = η IJ e I e J , where η IJ is the Minkowski metric, and the affine<br />

connection and curvature tensor are represented by an SO(3, 1) matrix-valued oneform<br />

ωJ I , and two-form R J<br />

I = dωI J + ωI K ∧ ωK J<br />

, respectively (see, e.g., [27] or<br />

[36]). Starting from this formulation, Ashtekar put the field equations of GR in<strong>to</strong><br />

a form closely resembling that of Yang–Mills theory by defining the “Ashtekar<br />

connection”, a three-connection on a space-like hypersurface that embodies all the<br />

information in the four-connection on the hypersurface (see Section 4.6). Much<br />

recent progress in LQG is based on this step.<br />

4.3.2 Projective and conformal structures<br />

Neither metric nor connection are irreducible group theoretically (see the earlier<br />

note on G-structures): each can be further decomposed. The metric splits<br />

in<strong>to</strong> a conformal, causality-determining structure and a volume-determining structure;<br />

the connection splits in<strong>to</strong> a projective, parallel path-determining structure,<br />

and an affine-parameter-determining structure. Physically, the conformal structure<br />

determines the behavior of null wave fronts and the dual null rays. The projective<br />

structure determines the preferred (“straightest”) paths of force-free monopole<br />

particles. 15 Given a pseudo-Riemannian S-T, the conformal and projective structures<br />

determine its metric. Conversely, given conformal and projective structures<br />

obeying certain compatibility conditions, the existence of a metric is guaranteed<br />

[11]. In GR, these compatibility conditions can be derived from a Palatini-type<br />

Lagrangian by taking the conformal, projective, volume-determining and affine<br />

parameter-determining structures as independent dynamical variables. There are<br />

curvature tensors associated with the conformal and the projective structure; the<br />

Weyl or conformal curvature tensor plays an important role in defining the structure<br />

of null infinity in asymp<strong>to</strong>tically flat S-Ts, and the projective curvature tensor<br />

plays a similar role in defining timelike infinity. This set of structures is currently<br />

being investigated as the possible basis of an approach <strong>to</strong> QG that incorporates the<br />

insights of causal set theory (see [35]). 16<br />

4.4 The problem of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong><br />

In the absence of an accepted theory of QG, measurability analysis (see the Introduction)<br />

of various classical dynamical variables in GR (see the previous section)<br />

15 A preferred affine curve, or au<strong>to</strong>-parallel, curve is parameterized by a preferred affine parameter; a preferred<br />

projective path is not so parameterized.<br />

16 A Lagrangian based on the volume-defining and causal structures is cubic in the conformal dynamical<br />

variables.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!