13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

258 E. Livine<br />

However, in contrast <strong>to</strong> the usual LQG framework, we also have second class<br />

constraints:<br />

φ ab = (⋆R a ) X R b X = 0, ψab ≈ RRD A R. (14.9)<br />

The constraint φ = 0 is the simplicity constraint. The constraint ψ = 0comes<br />

from the Poisson bracket {H,φ} and is required in order that the constraint φ = 0<br />

is preserved under gauge transformations (generated by G, H a , H) and in particular<br />

under time evolution. ψ corresponds <strong>to</strong> the reality constraint Re E∇[E, E] =0of<br />

complex LQG.<br />

To solve the second class constraints, we define the Dirac bracket { f, g} D =<br />

{ f, g} −{f,ϕ r }rs −1{ϕ<br />

s, g} where the Dirac matrix rs ={ϕ r ,ϕ s } is made of the<br />

Poisson brackets of the constraints ϕ = (φ, ψ). Following [8; 11], one then checks<br />

that the algebra of the first class constraints is not modified. Defining smeared<br />

constraints, we find the following Dirac brackets:<br />

∫<br />

∫<br />

∫<br />

G() = X G X , H(N) = NH, D( ⃗N) = N a (H a + Aa X G X),<br />

<br />

<br />

{<br />

}<br />

{<br />

}<br />

G( 1 ), G( 2 ) = G([ 1, 2 ]), D( ⃗N), D( ⃗M) =−D([ ⃗N, ⃗M]),<br />

{<br />

} D {<br />

} D<br />

D( ⃗N), G() =−G(N a ∂ a ), D( ⃗N), H(N) =−H(L ⃗N<br />

{<br />

N),<br />

D {<br />

} D<br />

H(N), G()<br />

}D = 0, H(N), H(M) = D( ⃗K ) − G(K b A b ),<br />

D<br />

[ 1 , 2 ] X = fYZ X 1 Z 2 , [ ⃗N, ⃗M] a = N b ∂ b M a − M b ∂ b N a ,<br />

LN ⃗ N = N a ∂ a N − N∂ a N a , K b = (N∂ a M − M∂ a N)R a X Rb Y g XY ,<br />

where fYZ X are the structure constant of the algebra sl(2, C). With A ∈{1, 2, 3}<br />

boost indices and B ∈{4, 5, 6} ∼{1, 2, 3} rotation indices, we have f<br />

AA A = f BB A =<br />

f<br />

AB B = 0and f AA A =−f AB A =−f BB B given by the antisymmetric tensor ɛ.<br />

The Gs generate SL(2, C) gauge transformations. The vec<strong>to</strong>r constraint H a generates<br />

spatial diffeomorphisms on the canonical hypersurface invariant . Finally,<br />

the scalar constraint H is called the Hamil<strong>to</strong>nian constraint and generates the (time)<br />

evolution of the canonical variables.<br />

<br />

14.2.2 The choice of connection and the area spectrum<br />

As shown in [8; 11; 12], although the triad field R is still commutative for the Dirac<br />

bracket, the properties of the connection A change drastically: it is not canonically<br />

conjugated <strong>to</strong> the triad and it does not commute with itself. Nevertheless, one<br />

should keep in mind that when using the Dirac bracket the original canonical variables<br />

lose their preferred status and we should feel free <strong>to</strong> identify better suited

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!