13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

192 T. Banks<br />

Since the holographic screen is central <strong>to</strong> these ideas, it is natural <strong>to</strong> take its<br />

geometry for a given causal diamond <strong>to</strong> be the primordial dynamical variable<br />

of <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>. Consider an infinitesimal area element on the screen. The<br />

Cartan–Penrose (CP) equation gives us a way <strong>to</strong> specify the holographic screen<br />

element associated with this area, in terms of a pure spinor. This is a commuting<br />

classical spinor satisfying<br />

¯ψγ μ ψγ μ ψ = 0.<br />

The equation implies that ¯ψγ μ ψ is a null vec<strong>to</strong>r,n μ , and the non-vanishing components<br />

of ¯ψγ μ 1...μ k<br />

ψ,forallk lie in a d − 2 hyperplane transverse <strong>to</strong> n μ .We<br />

will call ñ μ the reflected null vec<strong>to</strong>r transverse <strong>to</strong> the same surface and satisfying<br />

n μ ñ μ =−2. Actually, the CP equation is homogeneous and the rescaling ψ → λψ<br />

is considered a gauge equivalence at the classical level. The classical CP equation<br />

specifies only the local orientation of the holoscreen and of null directions passing<br />

through it. The non-vanishing components of the pure spinor<br />

S = γ μ n μ γ ν ñ ν ψ,<br />

transform like an SO(d − 2) spinor under rotations transverse <strong>to</strong> n μ .<br />

Thus, the full conformal structure of the holoscreen is encoded in an element,<br />

S a (σ ), of the spinor bundle over the holoscreen. S a are the real components of this<br />

spinor, and represent the independent components of a covariant spinor satisfying<br />

the CP equation.<br />

As might be expected from the Bekenstein–Hawking formula, the classical<br />

notion of area is only obtained after quantization of the spinor variables. If k<br />

specifies a pixel on the holoscreen, then we quantize S a (k) by postulating<br />

[S a (k), S b (k)] + = δ ab .<br />

This rule is SO(d −2) invariant, and assigns a finite number of states <strong>to</strong> the pixel. It<br />

also breaks the projective invariance of the CP equation down <strong>to</strong> the Z 2 , S a →−S a .<br />

We will keep this as a gauge invariance of the formalism, which will turn out <strong>to</strong> be<br />

fermion parity, (−1) F .<br />

The S a opera<strong>to</strong>rs for independent pixels should commute, but we can use this<br />

gauge invariance <strong>to</strong> perform a Klein transformation and cast the full opera<strong>to</strong>r<br />

algebra of the holoscreen as<br />

[S a (k), S b (l)] + = δ ab δ kl .<br />

We have used the word pixel, and discrete labeling <strong>to</strong> anticipate the fact that the<br />

requirement of a finite number of states forces us <strong>to</strong> discretize the geometry of<br />

the holoscreen of a finite area causal diamond. The labels k, l run over a finite<br />

set of integers. Note that the opera<strong>to</strong>r algebra is invariant under a larger group

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!