13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Algebraic approach <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> II 477<br />

24.3.1 Nonlinear fac<strong>to</strong>risation in the 2D bicrossproduct model<br />

Such models provide noncommutative spacetimes and Poincaré quantum groups in<br />

any dimension n based on a local fac<strong>to</strong>risation of SO n,1 or SO n−1,2 . The 4D model<br />

is known [23] but the 2D case has the same essential structure and we shall use this<br />

now <strong>to</strong> explore global and nonlinear issues, with full derivations.<br />

The first remark in the 2D case is that for a convenient description of the global<br />

picture we work not with SO 2,1 exactly but its double cover X = SL 2 (R) → SO 2,1 .<br />

The map here at the Lie algebra level is<br />

ã 0 = λ 2<br />

( ) 1 0<br />

→ λ<br />

0 −1<br />

⎛ ⎞<br />

0 0 1<br />

⎝0 0 0⎠ , Ñ = 1 2<br />

1 0 0<br />

ã 1 = λ<br />

( ) 0 1<br />

1 0<br />

⎛ ⎞<br />

( ) 0 0<br />

→ √ λ 0 −1 0<br />

⎝1 0 1⎠<br />

1 0 2<br />

0 1 0<br />

⎛ ⎞<br />

→ √ 1 0 0 0<br />

⎝0 0 1⎠<br />

2<br />

0 1 0<br />

for xt, yt boosts and xy-rotations with ++−signature being generated by<br />

−ıã 0 , √ 2Ñ, ˜M = −ı √ 2(λÑ −ã 1 ) respectively. The ã i close <strong>to</strong> the Lie algebra<br />

[ã 1 , ã 0 ]=λã 1 so generate a 2-dimensional nonAbelian Lie group M = R>⊳R<br />

along with G = SO 1,1 = R generated by Ñ. This gives a fac<strong>to</strong>risation SL 2 (R) ≈<br />

(R>⊳R).SO 1,1 as<br />

)<br />

) ( ) √<br />

1 b<br />

( a b<br />

c d<br />

( aμ 0<br />

=<br />

ac−bd<br />

aμ<br />

1<br />

aμ<br />

μ<br />

b<br />

aμ<br />

aμ<br />

1<br />

μ<br />

; μ =<br />

1 − b2<br />

a 2 ,<br />

|b| < |a|.<br />

This is valid in the domain shown which includes the identity in the group. It<br />

cannot be a completely global decomposition because <strong>to</strong>pologically SL 2 (R) and<br />

PSL 2 (R) = SO 2,1 have a compact direction and so cannot be described globally<br />

by 3 unbounded parameters (there is a compact SO 2 direction generated by ˜M).<br />

If one does not appreciate this and works with unbounded parameters one will at<br />

some stage encounter coordinate singularities, which is the origin of the Planckian<br />

bound for this model as well as other new effects (see below). From an alternative<br />

constructive point of view, as we solve the matched-pair equations for (R>⊳R)⊲⊳R<br />

we must encounter a singularity due <strong>to</strong> the nonlinearity. Note that this nonAbelian<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>risation and our construction of it cf. [23] is not the KAN decomposition in<strong>to</strong><br />

three subgroups.<br />

In the fac<strong>to</strong>risation we now change variables <strong>to</strong><br />

( )<br />

aμ = e λ θ<br />

2 p0 , ac − bd = λp 1 e λp0 , sinh<br />

2<br />

= b<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!