13.06.2015 Views

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

Approaches to Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Quantum</strong> Regge calculus 363<br />

group. We conclude that it is only infinitesimal conformal transformations which<br />

are well-defined so far in Regge calculus.<br />

A final point in this introduc<strong>to</strong>ry section is the existence of a continuum limit.<br />

Cheeger, Müller and Schrader [14; 15] showed rigorously that the Regge action<br />

converges <strong>to</strong> the continuum action, in the sense of measures, provided that certain<br />

conditions on the flatness of the simplices are satisfied. From the opposite perspective,<br />

Friedberg and Lee [22] derived the Regge action from the continuum in a<br />

certain limit. Rather than considering the action, Barrett [4; 5] explored the relationship<br />

between the Regge variational equations and Einstein’s equations, and set<br />

up a criterion [6] for solutions of the linearised Regge equations <strong>to</strong> converge <strong>to</strong><br />

analytic solutions of the linearised Einstein equations.<br />

Regge calculus has been used in many aspects of classical general relativity, but<br />

that is not our concern here. We now consider various ways in which it has been<br />

used in <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>. Most use the sum over his<strong>to</strong>ries approach <strong>to</strong> calculate<br />

the partition function or transition amplitude, although of course it is also possible<br />

<strong>to</strong> use the canonical approach, as will be seen in the penultimate section.<br />

19.2 The earliest quantum Regge calculus: the Ponzano–Regge model<br />

The first application of Regge calculus <strong>to</strong> <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong> came about in a rather<br />

unexpected way. In a paper on the asymp<strong>to</strong>tic behaviour of 6 j-symbols, Ponzano<br />

and Regge [58] formulated the following model. Triangulate a 3-manifold, and<br />

label each<br />

{<br />

edge with a<br />

}<br />

representation of SU(2), j i ={0, 1/2, 1, ...}. Assign a 6 j-<br />

j1 j<br />

symbol, 2 j 3<br />

(a generalised Clebsch–Gordan coefficient, which relates<br />

j 4 j 5 j 6<br />

bases of states when three angular momenta are added) <strong>to</strong> each tetrahedron. Form<br />

the state sum<br />

Z = ∑ ∏<br />

∏<br />

(2 j i + 1)(−1) χ {6 j}, (19.5)<br />

j i i<br />

tetrahedra<br />

where the χ in the phase fac<strong>to</strong>r is a function of the j i . This sum is infinite in many<br />

cases, but it has some very interesting properties. In particular, the semi-classical<br />

limit exhibits a connection with <strong>Quantum</strong> <strong>Gravity</strong>. The edge lengths can be thought<br />

of as ( j i + 1/2), and the limit is obtained by keeping these quantities finite while<br />

tends <strong>to</strong> zero and j i tends <strong>to</strong> infinity. Ponzano and Regge showed that, for large<br />

j i , the asymp<strong>to</strong>tic behaviour of the 6 j-symbol is<br />

{ }<br />

( )<br />

j1 j 2 j 3<br />

∼ 1 ∑<br />

√ cos j<br />

j 4 j 5 j i θ i + π/4 , (19.6)<br />

6 12π V<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!