16.06.2015 Views

Understanding Infrared Thermography Reading 7 Part 2 of 2.pdf

Understanding Infrared Thermography Reading 7 Part 2 of 2.pdf

Understanding Infrared Thermography Reading 7 Part 2 of 2.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EPRI Licensed Material<br />

Basic Elements <strong>of</strong> an In-House Program<br />

C. Vendor Recommended: Vendor-recommended equipment whose manufacturer or<br />

vendor recommends the periodic monitoring <strong>of</strong> the equipment with infrared<br />

thermography.<br />

D. Non-Vital: Non-Vital equipment shall be defined as:<br />

• Equipment whose replacement cost versus periodic monitoring cost does not differ<br />

greatly and does not fall into category A or B above.<br />

• Components that are used very infrequently and do not fall into category A or B.<br />

12.1.2 The IR administrator shall maintain a listing <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the components in the<br />

thermographic analysis program, the category to which they belong, and their monitoring<br />

interval.<br />

12.1.3 Equipment in category D that has a failure history relating to thermography might be<br />

included in the program in order to determine root cause, or to prevent failure recurrences<br />

or significant inconveniences. Otherwise, equipment in category D should be omitted<br />

from the program.<br />

12.1.4 The above recommended component selection criteria should be applied predominantly<br />

to electrical equipment such as:<br />

• Motor control centers<br />

• Load centers<br />

• Transformers<br />

• Switchgear<br />

• Battery chargers<br />

• Switchyard equipment<br />

• Large motor termination<br />

12.1.5 The above criteria can also be applied to:<br />

• Pumps/motors<br />

• Steam traps<br />

• Valves<br />

12.2 Performance Intervals<br />

12.2.1 The selection <strong>of</strong> performance intervals should be based upon several factors, such as:<br />

• The impact <strong>of</strong> the component on plant operation and personnel safety if an<br />

unexpected failure were to occur.<br />

• The speed at which a component fault manifests itself into a stage <strong>of</strong> degradation,<br />

which affects the component’s operability.<br />

• Vendor/manufacturers’ recommendations.<br />

• The category <strong>of</strong> the component as stated in section 12.1.1 <strong>of</strong> the program.<br />

6-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!