16.06.2015 Views

Understanding Infrared Thermography Reading 7 Part 2 of 2.pdf

Understanding Infrared Thermography Reading 7 Part 2 of 2.pdf

Understanding Infrared Thermography Reading 7 Part 2 of 2.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

When you are working with high-temperature materials, you can greatly<br />

reduce the errors due to uncertainty in emissivity by selecting infrared<br />

detectors that operate at narrow wavelength bands at shorter wavelengths.<br />

The math and physics necessary to prove this is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this<br />

application note. However, calculations demonstrate that by choosing an<br />

infrared sensor with a wavelength band close to 1 μm (rather than the 8 μm<br />

to 14 μm spectral band used by most thermal imagers), the maximum<br />

difference between the 2,000 ºF actual and apparent temperatures would be<br />

closer to 50 degrees (without knowing the precise emissivity <strong>of</strong> the material<br />

with better certainty).<br />

(the reflected low temperature spectrum is filter out leaving the high energy<br />

narrow wavelength representing the high temperature λ max )<br />

To summarize: Temperature measurement without knowledge in this case<br />

would result in an error <strong>of</strong> more than 400 ºF. Making the same measurement<br />

with knowledge would reduce the error to 50 ºF, with no better determination<br />

<strong>of</strong> the material’s emissivity.<br />

Charlie Chong/ Fion Zhang<br />

http://reliableplant.com/Read/14134/emissivity-underst-difference-between-apparent,-actual-ir-temps

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!