Odonata - Entomological Society of Latvia - Latvijas Daba

More documents

Recommendations

Info

unneum (Table 3). 59 distribution maps have been created. According to the relative distribution of species: 6. 9 species are very common; 7. 12 species are common; 8. 19 species are moderately represented; 9. 10 species are localized; 10. 9 species are very rare. Table 3. The number of dragonfly observations (number of entries in data base; n) and the percentage (n=12065) to the total number of dragonfly observations in Latvia. Taxon Familia Calopterygidae Calopteryx splendens (Harris, 1782) Calopteryx virgo (Linnaeus, 1758) Familia Lestidae Lestes dryas Kirby, 1890 Lestes sponsa (Hansemann, 1823) Lestes virens (Charpentier,1825) Sympecma paedisca (Brauer, 1877) Familia Platycnemididae Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas, 1771) Familia Coenagrionidae Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden, 1820) Ischnura pumilio (Charpentier, 1825) Enallagma cyathigerum (Charpentier, 1840) Coenagrion armatum (Charpentier, 1840) Coenagrion johanssoni (Wallengren, 1894) Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier, 1825) Coenagrion lunulatum (Charpentier, 1840) Coenagrion puella (Linnaeus, 1758) Coenagrion pulchellum (Vander Linden, 1825) Erythromma najas (Hansemann, 1823) Pyrrhosoma nymphula (Sulzer, 1776) Nehalennia speciosa (Charpentier, 1840) Familia Aeshnidae Brachytron pratense (Müller, 1764) Aeshna caerulea (Ström, 1783) Aeshna crenata Hagen, 1856 Aeshna cyanea (Müller, 1764) Aeshna grandis (Linnaeus, 1758) Aeshna isoceles (Müller, 1767) Aeshna juncea (Linnaeus, 1758) Aeshna mixta Latreille, 1805 Aeshna subarctica Walker, 1908 Total observation number per species n % 552 4.6 483 4.0 135 1.1 462 3.8 48 0.4 216 1.8 287 2.4 277 2.3 11 0.1 436 3.6 49 0.4 22 0.2 403 3.3 59 0.5 450 3.7 528 4.4 471 3.9 131 1.1 53 0.4 165 1.4 4 0.03 2 0.02 304 2.5 562 4.7 81 0.7 171 1.4 122 1.0 31 0.3 55
Continuation of Table 3 Taxon Aeshna viridis Eversmann, 1836 Anax ephippiger (Burmeister, 1839) Anax imperator Leach, 1815 Anax parthenope (Sélys, 1839) Familia Gomphidae Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier, 1825) Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus, 1758) Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linnaeus, 1758) Ophiogomphus cecilia (Fourcroy, 1785) Familia Cordulegsteridae Cordulegaster boltonii (Donovan, 1807) Familia Corduliidae Cordulia aenea (Linnaeus, 1758) Somatochlora arctica (Zetterstedt, 1840) Somatochlora flavomaculata (Vander Linden, 1825) Somatochlora metallica (Vander Linden, 1825) Epitheca bimaculata (Charpentier, 1825) Familia Libellulidae Libellula depressa Linnaeus, 1758 Libellula fulva Müller, 1764 Libellula quadrimaculata Linnaeus, 1758 Orthetrum brunneum (Fonscolumbe, 1837) Orthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus, 1758) Sympetrum danae (Sulzer, 1776) Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus, 1758) Sympetrum fonscolombii (Sélys, 1840) Sympetrum pedemontanum (Müller in Allioni, 1766) Sympetrum sanguineum (Müller, 1764) Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier, 1840) Sympetrum vulgatum (Linnaeus, 1758) Leucorrhinia albifrons (Burmeister, 1839) Leucorrhinia caudalis (Charpentier, 1840) Leucorrhinia dubia (Vander Linden, 1825) Leucorrhinia pectoralis (Charpentier, 1825) Leucorrhinia rubicunda (Linnaeus, 1758) Total observation number per species n % 119 1.0 1 0.01 90 0.7 6 0.06 8 0.1 344 2.9 232 1.9 156 1.3 42 0.3 576 4.7 19 0.2 135 1.1 341 2.8 104 0.9 204 1.7 108 0.9 685 5.7 1 0.01 264 2.2 311 2.6 297 2.5 6 0.05 3 0.02 224 1.9 12 0.1 273 2.3 231 1.8 163 1.4 119 1.0 257 2.1 213 1.7 56
Page 1 and 2:
LATVIJAS UNIVERSITĀTE Bioloģijas
Page 3 and 4:
SATURS / CONTENT 1. IEVADS.........
Page 5 and 6: 1.2. PĒTĪJUMA MĒRĶIS, DARBA UZD
Page 7 and 8: Citas publikācijas Kalniņš M., J
Page 9 and 10: 2. MATERIĀLI UN METODES Pamatdati.
Page 11 and 12: izmantota standartizēta paraugu ie
Page 13 and 14: 3. REZULTĀTI 3.1. SPĀRU FAUNISTIS
Page 15 and 16: Dati par spārēm aptver 839 kvadr
Page 17 and 18: 3. tabulas turpinājums Taksons Aes
Page 19 and 20: Pēc procentuālā seguma transekt
Page 21 and 22: 3.3. GOMPHIDAE DZIMTAS SPĀRU KĀPU
Page 23 and 24: 11. attēls. Nehalennia speciosa iz
Page 25 and 26: Ophiogomphus cecilia. Suga konstat
Page 27 and 28: 16. attēls. Leucorrhinia pectorali
Page 29 and 30: sugas ar ļoti plašiem vai plašie
Page 31 and 32: faktors ir tas, cik kokaugu veģet
Page 33 and 34: sastopama oļu un akmeņu mikrobiot
Page 35 and 36: Salīdzinot sugas apdzīvotos bioto
Page 37 and 38: meklējumiem īpaši aizsargājamo
Page 39: 6. PATEICĪBAS Paldies darba vadīt
Page 42 and 43: The Doctoral thesis was developed i
Page 44 and 45: 1.2. THE AIM, TASKS AND THESES The
Page 46 and 47: Kalniņš M. 2006. The distribution
Page 48 and 49: 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS Basic data.
Page 50 and 51: 2.3. RESEARCH OF THE OCCURRENCE AND
Page 52 and 53: Figure 1. The location of dragonfly
Page 54 and 55: Table 2. Potential southern species
Page 58 and 59: 3.2. THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF DR
Page 60 and 61: Figure 7. Correlation between veget
Page 62 and 63: Pe 5% Gr 15% Co 12% Ma 3% Mu 26% De
Page 64 and 65: Figure 12. A distribution of Aeshna
Page 66 and 67: Figure 14. A distribution of Leucor
Page 68 and 69: 4. DISCUSSION 4.1. THE CHANGES IN D
Page 70 and 71: many other issues are not specific
Page 72 and 73: habitats of open or wooded bogs. Ac
Page 74 and 75: of its localities. This general cor
Page 76 and 77: Figure 19. A distribution of Aeshna
Page 78 and 79: suitability of a habitat is charact
Page 80 and 81: 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My thanks to my
Page 82 and 83: De Marmels J., Schiess H. 1977. Zum
Page 84 and 85: Niemelä J., Kotze J., Ashworth A.,
show all

Odonata - Entomological Society of Latvia - Latvijas Daba

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?