580 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OCTOBER, 1941modified. The flywheel is a member which can be modifiedwithout undue practical difficulty. Fig. 2 indicates the changeof conditions brought about by varying 7j from 200 lb in. sec2 to20 lb in. sec2, keeping K i constant at 3 X 10* lb in. radian. ForIi = 20 lb in. see2 the value of N is not raised much nor is theactual twist in the engine shaft changed much; but the valueof (Aj + AijAs is reduced to one third of its value for = 200lb in. sec2. While this value is still three times greater than itwas in the original design, it is a large change in the right direction.A further change which could be investigated would be theintroduction of an additional flywheel between the flexiblecoupling and the slow-speed gear. This would reduce N, theactual twist in the crankshaft, and (Ai + A i)A t, all steps in theright directioii. This additional flywheel, if used at all, shouldnot be introduced on the high-speed side of the gearing since itwould then increase Is' and thereby increase the tendency toproduce gear chatter.After these three things have been done, all steps which areeasy to take have been taken. If, after all this, the systemactually has amplitudes of vibration so large that dangerousstresses exist in the crankshaft or coupling and gear chatterdevelops, then the designer is really confronted with a difficultproblem. Devices especially designed to reduce vibrationwould have to be introduced into the system, and this representsa major problem after the system is put into operation.This last case was discussed in some detail to indicate thatsuccessful coupling application is only possible through completedynamic analysis of the entire rotating system. It should beremembered that only the effects on the lowest mode of vibrationhave been investigated. In many cases the second and thirdmodes of motion might have to be analyzed in the same mannerin order to insure safe or noiseless operation.N o n l in e a r C o u p l in g sI t is a popular misconception that flexible couplings whichhave torque-deflection curves that are not straight lines arecure-alls for torsional-vibration troubles. I t is often imaginedthat torsional resonance cannot occur if such a coupling isintroduced into the rotating systems. This belief may be basedon the statements made by recognized authorities that noinfinite amplitudes of motion are possible in a system whichcontains a nonlinear coupling, even if frictional damping werecompletely absent. While this is true, and it is also a fact thatvery complicated relationships exist between torque, frequency,and amplitude of motion, it should be understood that conditionsresembling resonance with linear couplings also exist with nonlinearcouplings. Amplitudes of motion large enough to causetrouble can exist at certain frequencies even if nonlinear couplingsare used. The reader is referred to a paper entitled “SteadyOscillations of Systems With Nonlinear and UnsymmetricalElasticity,” by Manfred Rauscher, Trans. A.S.M.E., vol. 60,1938, p. A-169. This paper indicates methods by which suchcouplings can be analyzed and also refers to numerous otherpapers on this subject that could be perused to get a completepicture of the situation existing when nonlinear couplings areused.C o u p l in g S t r e n g t h a n d S a f e t yIn this paper only the effects of the elastic properties of thecoupling have been considered. The ability of the flexibleelements to withstand the twisting torques encountered inoperation has been completely omitted. A great variety ofcouplings could be used to get the same flexibility. Each oneconsidered would have to be analyzed to ascertain its adequacyto meet the operating conditions at resonance. If it is strongenough to take the torques at resonance safely, it is more thansafe at all other operating speeds. The most general remarkthat can be made in this connection is that safety in a flexiblecoupling is to be attained by using the largest possible volume ofelastic material which gives the desired spring constant in thespace available for the coupling. Also, the most efficient use ofelastic materials in couplings is gotten by stressing the materialsin pure tension, pure compression, or pure shear. This is usuallyonly practical in couplings in which rubber is the elastic medium.Where metals form the elastic elements reasonable deflections aregotten only by using the material in twist or bending. Underthese modes of stressing a fair percentage of the metal is notcarrying large stresses. Under these conditions either very highfatigue limits must be used or volumes of metal hard to pack intoreasonable space limitations must be considered.D iscussionE. L. D a v i s .2 Referring to case 1, of the paper, the instantaneousapplication of maximum engine torque, the formula derivationshown in Equations [1] through [7] is considered as a theoreticalproblem correctly derived but unpractically used. Thisproblem is intended to represent an engine driving some machine.It is believed incorrect to assume a single disk as representing thereciprocating-and-rotating-mass system of the entire engine,when a solid coupling connects the engine and driven machine.On the other hand, it is acceptable to consider the case, as originallyintended, when there is an abundance of flexibility producedthrough the medium of a flexible coupling. A typical practicalproblem of this nature was calculated by the author in a previousarticle.3 In the case of a solid coupling, the node was betweenthe last cylinder and the engine flywheel, whereas, in the case of aflexible coupling the node was in the coupling hub mounted on theengine shaft.A close approximate derivation can be made for solid couplingsonly by using Equations [1] to [5], inclusive. By placing thenode in the mass 7i, we have p2 = — instead of K -■-■t-—-.I 2 I 1I 2TTThen = ——(cos pt — 1) and Equation [6] becomes K = — —T K 1 1 / 1 2I l h2 T(cos pt — 1) and Equation [7] becomes Mmai = - instead of11/122 T2 TThe formula tfm o = zr~~ can be used for solid couplings, andI 1/I 22Tthe formula M m„ = ------ —can be used for flexible couplings., , IiIn comparing the problems given in the author’s previousarticle,3 the value jr = 0.846 for both solid- and flexible-coupling12problems. When using Equation [7] as revised and as shown, wehave values of M m„. as 1.082T and 2.46T, respectively. Thismeans that the torque in the shaft for a solid coupling is 2.27times that for a flexible coupling. It also shows that the maximumstress in the case of the solid coupling is in the crankshaft,while the maximum stress in the case of a flexible coupling is inthe coupling.2 Analyst, The Falk Corporation, Milwaukee, Wis.8 “Problem of Torsional Vibration Increases W ith Engine Power,”by J. Ormondroyd, Machine Design, vol. 3, June, 1931, pp. 37-40.
ORMONDROYD—FLEXIBLE COUPLINGS FOR INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINES 581Other values of —and their respective shaft torques are shown12in the following tabhh .......................Mmax for flexible!coupling /M max for solid!coupling / ' 'Referring to the author’s case 4, tooth chatter in gear drives,it is pointed out in the concrete example given that, in the case ofa solid coupling, the major critical fourth-order speed occurs at725 rpm and, in the case of the flexible coupling, the minor secondordercritical is at 400 rpm. Inasmuch as the operating range ofthis drive is from 700 to 900 rpm and the lowest possible runningrange would be 500 rpm, it is evident that the use of a flexiblecoupling here is advantageous. Fig. 1 of the paper could beslightly revised by drawing two horizontal lines at 700 and 900rpm to show the operating-speed range for gear-chatter comparison.In regard to the equations on the third page of the paper, it isfound that 7r2 has been omitted. These equations should read asfollowsandW. P. S c h m i t t e r . 4 Reduction of Dynamic Loads. The authorhas reduced four typical dynamical situations to relatively simpleexpressions. Many practical cases cannot be so readily analyzed.Take, for instance, the rather complex example of an enginedrivensystem containing a gear train with known tooth-spacingerrors. The magnitude of the dynamic loading of the gears willdepend, among other things, upon the rigidity of the system.Resilient couplings on both sides of the gears will permit a greaterdegree of acceleration and deceleration of the gear masses in responseto the errors, thus, not only localizing their effects, butmaking for materially lower tooth stresses than with nonresilientcouplings. The solution for any given case may be obtained byfollowing the methods developed in a, bulletin6 published by theSociety.Impact Loading From Driven Machine. Practical examples ofcase 2 are seen in systems in which sudden load decelerations ofthe driven machine take place, thus requiring considerable energyto be absorbed. There are numerous cases of the use of resilientcouplings to alleviate bad situations in severe rolling-mill andsimilar drives. Where all the factors are known, the relativestresses can be computed.Torsional Resonance. Severe resonance may frequently beavoided by application of nonlinear resilient couplings, becausethe tuning changes with the increased amplitude. We agreethat complete analysis of the rotating system is necessary in orderto avoid unfavorable situations. No flexible coupling can be expectedto operate satisfactorily in a bad critical.We consider damping a most important property of the “Steelflex”(Bibby) coupling of the writer’s company. The hysteresisloop obtained in static testing is due to its characteristic design.This is further increased dynamically by the action upon the greasewithin the sealed enclosure.4 Chief Engineer, The Falk Corporation, Milwaukee, Wis.s “Dynamic Loads on Gear T eeth,” A.S.M.E. Report of SpecialResearch Committee on Strength of Gear Teeth, 1931.Gear-Tooth Chatter. Resilient couplings of this type may berelied upon to avoid certain types of tooth chatter. In the rotarydrumcrushing field, herringbone pinions had formerly to beshrouded to avoid their axial displacement during the break intooth contact from effects of the cascading material. Theshrouds are eliminated whenever the couplings mentioned areapplied because the potential energy stored is sufficient tomake the pinion follow the gear when rapid speed fluctuationsoccur.Coupling Strength and Safety. It is exceedingly difficult todraw any arbitrary conclusions with respect to the most efficacioususe of materials in flexible couplings since so much dependson design, as the following analysis will demonstrate. Maximumstrength in an articulated double-acting coupling is obtainedwhen the shear strength of the individual interlocking elements isequal. If a nonlinear resilient coupling of the type previouslymentioned is designed so that the grid is in shear at the limit-loadpeak, its strength at that point is equal to that of the nonresilientcoupling. At lower torques, the grid transmits the load through acontinuous variable-span beam. The entire grid material includingloops is constantly under stress, thus the resilience of thecoupling is unusually high, despite comparable size and safetyfactors.A. M. W a h l . 6 For some time past, the writer has been interestedin the design of couplings for induction-motor drives,7 particularlythose subject to frequent starts and stops as is the case,for example, in the roll-table drive used in continuous strip mills.Because of the electrical characteristics of the induction motor,such systems on starting are subject to a suddenly applied pulsatingtorque at the line frequency which dies out after a time. Thistype of transient-torque application gives rise to two effects, i.e.(1) if the natural frequency of the drive approaches the line frequency,a resonant condition will be present, and (2) because ofthe sudden application of torque an impact effect occurs, whichis augmented by the nonlinear characteristic of the usual coupling.In certain practical applications, considerable trouble hasarisen from these causes. In cases where motors are startedand stopped frequently, this problem is of particular importance,since a sufficient number of cycles of stress may takeplace eventually to cause failure of the mechanical parts of thesystem.The writer wonders whether or not a similar condition may notbe present during the starting of an internal-combustion engine,coupled to its load by means of a flexible coupling. In such acase, a suddenly applied pulsating torque, set up as a consequenceof the explosions of individual cylinders, would be present.For the nonlinear coupling usually applied in such cases, such atorque might give rise to stresses of considerable magnitude as aconsequence of impact effects. In addition, because of the pulsatingtorque, due to the explosions of individual cylinders, itwould appear that there is a possibility of increased torque due toresonance for certain values of the natural frequency of the system.It is realized that such conditions probably occur butrarely in practice, however, in cases where such systems arestarted and stopped frequently an analysis of such torques mightbe worth-while.The writer agrees with the author that conditions resemblingresonance may occur even with nonlinear couplings. Such conditionshave, in fact, been observed in tests on induction-motordrives, the torque being measured by means of a magnetic torsisMechanics D epartm ent, W estinghouse Research Laboratories,E ast Pittsburgh, Pa. Mem. A.S.M.E.’ “Transient Torques in Induction-M otor Drives,” by A. M . Wahl,Journal of Applied Mechanics, Trans. A.S.M.E., vol. 63, 1941, pp.A-17-A-22.
- Page 1 and 2: Transactionsof theHeat Transfer to
- Page 3 and 4: H eat T ran sfer to H ydrogen-N itr
- Page 5 and 6: COLBURN, COGHLAN—HEAT TRANSFER TO
- Page 7 and 8: COLBURN, COGHLAN—HEAT TRANSFER TO
- Page 9 and 10: Electric-Slip Couplings for UseW it
- Page 11 and 12: ANDRIOLA—ELECTRIC-SLIP COUPLINGS
- Page 13 and 14: ANDRIOLA—ELECTRIC-SLIP COUPLINGS
- Page 15 and 16: ANDRIOLA—ELECTRIC-SLIP COUPLINGS
- Page 17 and 18: ANDRIOLA—ELECTRIC-SLIP COUPLINGS
- Page 19 and 20: Flexible Couplings for Internal-C o
- Page 21: ORMONDROYD—FLEXIBLE COUPLINGS FOR
- Page 25 and 26: C om bustion Explosions in P ressur
- Page 27 and 28: CREECH—COMBUSTION EXPLOSIONS IN P
- Page 29 and 30: CREECH—COMBUSTION EXPLOSIONS IN P
- Page 31 and 32: M athem atics of Surge Vessels and
- Page 33 and 34: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 35 and 36: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 37 and 38: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 39 and 40: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 41 and 42: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 43 and 44: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 45 and 46: 604 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 47 and 48: 606 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 49 and 50: 608 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 51 and 52: 610 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 53 and 54: TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OCTOBE
- Page 55 and 56: 614 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 58 and 59: 618 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 60 and 61: 620 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 62 and 63: 622 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 64 and 65: 624 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 66 and 67: 626 TRANSACTIONS OF TH E A.S.M.E. O
- Page 68 and 69: 628 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 70 and 71: Flow P roperties of L ubricantsU nd
- Page 72 and 73:
NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 74 and 75:
NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 76 and 77:
NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 78 and 79:
NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 80 and 81:
NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 82 and 83:
NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 84 and 85:
646 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 86 and 87:
648 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 88 and 89:
650 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 90 and 91:
652 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 92 and 93:
A H igh-T em perature Bolting M ate
- Page 94 and 95:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEMPERATURE BOLTIN
- Page 96 and 97:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEM PERATURE BOLTI
- Page 98 and 99:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEM PERATURE BOLTI
- Page 100 and 101:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEMPERATURE BOLTIN
- Page 102 and 103:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEMPERATURE BOLTIN
- Page 104 and 105:
W HEELER—A HIGH-TEMPERATURE BOLTI