G raphical M ethods for P lotting Time-Speed-D istance C urves for R ailw ay T rain sThe paper reviews briefly th e in terest displayed som eyears ago in Europe, particularly in 'R ussia, in graphicalm ethods for plottin g tim e-sp eed -d istan ce curves for railwaytrain s and develops m eth od s devised by th e au thorfor p lo ttin g such curves. A nalytical m eth od s and th egraphical m ethod are com pared and th e results are ta b u lated, and th e author’s m eth od s are applied to data fromruns o f high-speed trains in th is country.B y A. I. LIPETZ,1 SCHENECTADY, N. Y.ABOUT thirty years ago great interest was displayed inEurope, especially in Russia, in graphical methods bywhich speed versus time, or speed versus distance, or distanceversus time for trains between two stations could be determined.Special methods had been worked out and were in usein some Russian railway offices; and the development of thesemethods became sort of a fad in which railway officials and youngengineers vied with each other. Naturally, these developmentswere reflected in the Russian technical press. A well-knownrailway official and college teacher, Prof. G. V. Lomonossoff,and some of his pupils and friends became active in this gameand greatly contributed to the current literature of that period(1, 2, 3, 4).*Likewise, a similar interest was displayed in Germany, with acorresponding reflection in the German press (5, 6). Variousmethods had been developed in Germany, which later were reviewedin a symposium by Dittmann (7). In this work fivemethods were described.In the United States, analytical methods are mainly in use,although in some cases graphical methods have been resortedto for auxiliary calculations (8, 9, 10).It so happened that after the Russian revolution the men whowere active in this development in Russia were scattered all overthe world—Lomonossoff emigrated first to Germany and later toEngland; Chechott first to Poland and then to Persia (Iran);Lipetz, the author of this paper, to this country, and others toFrance, Germany, and elsewhere. Thus little has been publishedin English; most of the publications appeared in Russian, Polish,German, and French (11, 12, 13, 14). Owing to pressure ofbusiness and preparation of other articles, the author has notmade his method known in this country, although it had beenin exclusive use in Russia, partially in Poland, in Germany,under the name Lipetz-Strahl (12, p. 29), and France, where itwas later used by Cremer (13) and others (24). In this countryit is used by the author and some of his associates (H. Cregier andS. Slastenin) in calculations needed for designing and investigationof some high-speed locomotives in the offices of the AmericanLocomotive Company. However, it has never been fully published,although it was mentioned and used as an illustration inthe author’s discussion of C. T. Ripley’s paper (17). The latteromission is now corrected by the presentation of this paper.1 Chief Consulting Engineer, in charge of Research, AmericanLocomotive Company.* Numbers in parentheses refer to Bibliography a t end of paper.Contributed by the Railroad Division and presented a t the AnnualMeeting, New York, N. Y., Dec. 2-6, 1940, of T h e A m e r ic a nS o c ie t y o f M e c h a n ic a l E n g i n e e r s .N o t e : Statem ents and opinions advanced in papers are to beunderstood as individual expressions of their authors, and not thoseof the Society.I n t e g r a t io n o p E q u a t io n o p T r a in M o v e m e n tThe time and running distance of a train under the influenceof various forces applied to it are defined by the fundamentalequation of the movement of the train. If a train, as a body withmass M, is covering an elementary distance ds under the influenceof locomotive tractive effort T and train resistances B(forces which may be applied to different parts of the train, likefriction of brake shoes to wheels, axle resistance to journals, airresistance to car bodies, gravity to centers of mass of cars andlocomotives), the elementary change of energy dE in time dt on adistance ds is'f v is the momentary and dv the differential of speed.As every train, in addition to the translatory movement of itsjar bodies, has rotating parts (wheels, motors, gears), this equaiionshould be amplified. Let the polar moments of inertia ofjach rotating part around its axis be I; the increment of energys then (12, p. 10; 16, p. 10)HenceThis is the fundamental equation of the movement of a train.It is usually simplified by referring the members with moments ofinertia of rotating parts ^ ^which has the dimension of mass,to the total mass of the respective equipment, locomotive andcars. Depending upon their dimensions, these ratios y fluctuatefrom 0.04 to 0.30 for different equipment; for instance, for steamlocomotives it is about 5 per cent, i.e.going up to 0.06 for high-speed steam locomotives with largewheels. In this formula I is the moment of inertia of everydriving wheel and axle of the locomotive; p the respective outsideradii of the wheels, and M, the mass of the locomotive. Forelectric locomotives with motors geared to the axles y = 0.3 to0.4, including all these parts. For loaded freight cars y =0.03; for empty freight cars y = 0.11 (12, p. 10; 6, p. 142).For the whole train the influence of the rotating parts is ofsecondary importance, for instance, for a train consisting of asteam locomotive of 300 tons and passenger cars of 500 tons, theratio y isFor another sort of equipment, a light electric locomotive andloaded freight carsFor heavy Diesel locomotives and streamline passenger cars603
604 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OCTOBER, 1941We should consider then the approximate formulaThe average of these three cases gives y = 0.0847.The case of empty freight cars has not been considered, as itis unlikely that empty freight cars would be transported bymodern high-speed locomotives.Equation [1] is written in absolute units of foot, pound, andsecond—see Lionel S. Marks, Mechanical Engineer’s Handbook,first edition, 1916, page 73 (symbols in lower-case letters). Forunits which are customary in railroad engineering, capital lettersare used; for miles of length, one mile equals 5280 ft; for speed3600 1F in miles per hour V = rrion X v — - - g(T X v, where v is in fps.5280 ' ' ' 1.4671For acceleration in miles per hour per second A =1.467 X a,where a is in fpsps; and for mass M in tons of 2000 lb of weight =32.17 1—---- = ------ tons of weight.2000 62.17 6For these latter units, a constant C must be introduced in the1right side of Equation [1] (10, p. 19; 25, p. 49) equal to C =62.17 X1 1 dV------ = ------ , if V is in miles per hour, t in seconds, — in miles1.467 91.18 dtper hour per second, (T — R) in lb of weight, and M in tons ofweight.dsRemembering that v = — and canceling ds, Equation [11 willdtas close to the average conditions of modern trains. However,if the consist and y of the train are known in advance, a more accuratecoefficient can be figured out and formula [la] should beused instead of [2a],If the time-speed curve, namely, speed versus time, is thedVone sought, then — is the tangent to this curve. Equation [2]shows that the tangent is represented by a simple relation, thedifference between tractive effort and train resistance in poundsper ton of train weight divided by 100 for American units, mile,hour (respectively, second), and ton. If curves of Fig. 1 representtractive effort of the locomotive and R the train resistanceversus speed V, then the ordinates of the shaded area ABCDArepresent in a certain scale the right-hand side of Equation [2],The desired acceleration curve will be found if a curve is so builtthat the tangents to it are equal to the ordinates divided by98.69 or 100, as the case may be.Suppose that a train stands in a station and the locomotivestarts to accelerate it from standstill on a level. The excess oftractive effort over the train resistance on a level at low speedsfrom zero will be represented by the shaded area, and under theinfluence of this difference of forces the train will be acceleratedfrom zero speed until the balanced speed Vo is reached (Fig. 1),at which point the two forces (tractive effort and train resistance)readcLVwhere V is speed in miles per hour, and t time in seconds; — acdtceleration in miles per hour per second.Since y for trains of different consist varies from 0.04 to 0.1233,with an average of 0.0847, the author assumed that Equation[la] can, for average conditions, be rewrittenwhere — is acceleration in miles per hour per second: t and rdtare tractive effort and train resistance in pounds per ton of theirweight, and the coefficient corresponds to 91.18(1 + y) = 91.18X 1.0847 = 98.69, or approximately 100. F i g . 1 T r a c t i v e E f f o r t a n d T k a i n R e s i s t a n c e
- Page 1 and 2: Transactionsof theHeat Transfer to
- Page 3 and 4: H eat T ran sfer to H ydrogen-N itr
- Page 5 and 6: COLBURN, COGHLAN—HEAT TRANSFER TO
- Page 7 and 8: COLBURN, COGHLAN—HEAT TRANSFER TO
- Page 9 and 10: Electric-Slip Couplings for UseW it
- Page 11 and 12: ANDRIOLA—ELECTRIC-SLIP COUPLINGS
- Page 13 and 14: ANDRIOLA—ELECTRIC-SLIP COUPLINGS
- Page 15 and 16: ANDRIOLA—ELECTRIC-SLIP COUPLINGS
- Page 17 and 18: ANDRIOLA—ELECTRIC-SLIP COUPLINGS
- Page 19 and 20: Flexible Couplings for Internal-C o
- Page 21 and 22: ORMONDROYD—FLEXIBLE COUPLINGS FOR
- Page 23 and 24: ORMONDROYD—FLEXIBLE COUPLINGS FOR
- Page 25 and 26: C om bustion Explosions in P ressur
- Page 27 and 28: CREECH—COMBUSTION EXPLOSIONS IN P
- Page 29 and 30: CREECH—COMBUSTION EXPLOSIONS IN P
- Page 31 and 32: M athem atics of Surge Vessels and
- Page 33 and 34: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 35 and 36: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 37 and 38: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 39 and 40: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 41 and 42: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 43: MASON, PHILBRICK—MATHEMATICS OF S
- Page 47 and 48: 606 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 49 and 50: 608 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 51 and 52: 610 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 53 and 54: TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OCTOBE
- Page 55 and 56: 614 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 58 and 59: 618 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 60 and 61: 620 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 62 and 63: 622 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 64 and 65: 624 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 66 and 67: 626 TRANSACTIONS OF TH E A.S.M.E. O
- Page 68 and 69: 628 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 70 and 71: Flow P roperties of L ubricantsU nd
- Page 72 and 73: NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 74 and 75: NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 76 and 77: NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 78 and 79: NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 80 and 81: NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 82 and 83: NORTON, KNOTT, MUENGER—FLOW PROPE
- Page 84 and 85: 646 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 86 and 87: 648 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 88 and 89: 650 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 90 and 91: 652 TRANSACTIONS OF THE A.S.M.E. OC
- Page 92 and 93: A H igh-T em perature Bolting M ate
- Page 94 and 95:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEMPERATURE BOLTIN
- Page 96 and 97:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEM PERATURE BOLTI
- Page 98 and 99:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEM PERATURE BOLTI
- Page 100 and 101:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEMPERATURE BOLTIN
- Page 102 and 103:
WHEELER—A HIGH-TEMPERATURE BOLTIN
- Page 104 and 105:
W HEELER—A HIGH-TEMPERATURE BOLTI